We performed a comparison between SCOM and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is the capability of using classes within your management pack development."
"I like the historical reporting of observer metrics."
"The most valuable feature is the extensibility, as there are really no limits as to what you can do with it."
"The solution has improved our overrides and the ability to start services if they're stopped."
"It's easy to use."
"The product’s auto-remediation feature helps with automation."
"I like some of their newer features, such as maintenance schedules, because SCOM records SLA and SLO time."
"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."
"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."
"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."
"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."
"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved."
"Regarding certain issues in the solution, it can be difficult to generate reports if we have a program that is not user-friendly for reporting. While this is not necessarily negative, we may need to use another solution."
"The price could be improved."
"System Center just provided upgrade and update features for Windows clients, and Windows systems, and did not support Linux, Android, or iOS, and other operating systems. They need to provide better integration with other operating systems if they don't already."
"I would like to see more standard libraries for the market solutions, out of the box, that you don't need to do a lot of work on."
"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."
"Stability and some performance issues exist and they need improvement."
"I would like to see them improve their network monitoring."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."
SCOM is ranked 11th in Network Monitoring Software with 77 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and Nagios XI, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
