Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Savision Live Maps vs TruView comparison

The compared Martello and NETSCOUT solutions aren't in the same category. Martello is ranked #89 in APM , and holds a 0.1% mindshare in the category. NETSCOUT is ranked #66 in NMS , with an average rating of 6.5, and holds a 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Martello users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.
Savision Live Maps
Read 1 Savision Live Maps review
  • 146 Views
  • 98 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TruView
Read 17 TruView reviews
  • 367 Views
  • 178 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Savision Live Maps and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 853,118 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Savision Live Maps
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (89th)
TruView
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (66th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Savision Live Maps and TruView aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Savision Live Maps is designed for Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
TruView, on the other hand, focuses on Network Monitoring Software, holds 0.1% mindshare, down 0.2% since last year.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

MO
Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components
Savision continuously develops new modules to allow further integration, so the only item would continue with this effort to allow more-and-more systems to integrate into this platform. Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion.
Read full review
MM
Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network
We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM."
"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
 

Cons

"Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about TruView?
The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TruView?
There are certain licensing costs. For example, if you use NetFlow, you need to purchase a license depending on the size of your connector. Similarly, for voice monitoring, you need a separate lice...
See all answers
What needs improvement with TruView?
We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SCOM vs Savision Live Maps Logo
SCOM vs Savision Live Maps
Compared 71% of the time
New Relic vs Savision Live Maps Logo
New Relic vs Savision Live Maps
Compared 29% of the time
More Savision Live Maps Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Savision Live Maps reportDownload Savision Live Maps product report
Buyer's Guide
TruView
May 2025
TruView reportDownload TruView product report
 

Also Known As

Live Maps
No data available
 

Overview

Business Service Management Visualization & Grouping Tools for Microsoft System Centre
Martello

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT
 

Sample Customers

Municipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives
FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
May 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.