We performed a comparison between SAS Access and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. SAS Access is rated 9.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS, Zapier and Toad Data Point, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our SAS Access vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
