SAP ERP vs Unit4 Business World comparison

"The implementation is very straightforward."

"The solution is very mature."

"The best feature of SAP ERP is the full integration."

"The new Visual Enterprise functionalities give an intuitive approach to data and make communication between engineering and production easy."

"SAP is already working on improvements by doing annual releases with enhancements."

"The stability is SAP ERP is not good only because the version is old. They could work on improving the versions."

"The best thing that SAP ERP has is the extensive coverage of processes for every field and business unit such as procurement, inventory, financials, asset management, plant maintenance, and production. We can cover up to 99.9% processes of our organization, which is the best thing about this solution. It also has a very good capability to integrate with other applications. The security and authorization level of SAP ERP is very high. No other solution can match this level."

"SAP is more reliable in terms of data quality than other systems."

"Unit4 Business World's most valuable feature is flexibility. Its dashboards are easy."

"The product's self-service capabilities have benefited our organization."

"Unit4 Business World is a reliable product."

"I think we have not seen any tangible benefits from SAP ERP."

"SAP ERP needs to be more innovative when it comes to areas like mobility and the internet."

"It should be less complex. It should also have better integration capability. I am using the ACC version, and in this version, the integration and the communication are very difficult and complicated."

"ERP could use better integration with other systems."

"In the next release, I would like to see more technical integration for directly designed solutions on behalf of the selling process so that you can design solutions and not have to use ten or more other tools to get the solution for selling."

"The problem for us, we are one company that has seven home markets. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. When we need to configure, modify rules, change policies, or taxes rules, when we move currencies around based on our other financial results, it can get very complicated. When we try to join everything together we have some problems. However, the process good, all of our material and procurement processes are going well. The problem is trying to consolidate the financial reports and this is where I have problems."

"The initial setup was challenging initially. People did not understand much about what SAP could do."

"Lacks sufficient technical support with slow response times."

"I would like to see more flexibility in the customization for us to be able to customize it based on the client's requirements."

"Reporting and analytics features must be improved."

"I would like to see direct communication support to engage with clients. The parent company should have a direct relationship with clients. Also, the tool's licensing, upgrade, and maintenance costs should be reduced."

"The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive."

"Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."

"The solution is expensive and is best-suited for large enterprises."

"The price of SAP ERP is high, but it is worth the money. The maintenance and support can be expensive. There should be a different price model for businesses that are not as large to be able to afford it."

"The solution has moved from a licensing model to a rights-based, subscription model in the cloud."

"SAP ERP is an expensive tool."

"SAP ERP is expensive."

"We pay annually for the use of this solution."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."