SAP Data Quality Management vs Syniti Data Quality comparison

SAP and Syniti are both solutions in the Data Quality category. SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0, while Syniti is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. SAP holds a 3.1% mindshare in DQ, compared to Syniti’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Syniti users who would recommend it.

SAP Data Quality Management

Read 3 SAP Data Quality Management reviews

547 Views
520 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Syniti Data Quality

Read 4 Syniti Data Quality reviews

969 Views
969 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Data Quality Management

Syniti Data Quality

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

SAP Data Quality Management and Syniti Data Quality compete in data quality solutions. Syniti Data Quality seems to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, while SAP Data Quality Management might be more favorable for pricing and customer support.

Features: SAP Data Quality Management offers seamless integration with SAP systems, providing strong profiling, cleansing, and enrichment capabilities. Syniti Data Quality excels with powerful data governance, collaboration functionalities, and suitability for large-scale data projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Syniti Data Quality offers flexible deployment with cloud and on-premise options and strong customer service for smooth implementation and support. SAP Data Quality Management may need complex setup within SAP environments but benefits from dedicated SAP support.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Data Quality Management has a streamlined pricing model, budget-friendly for SAP users, with solid ROI within SAP ecosystems. Syniti Data Quality may have higher initial setup costs but offers substantial ROI due to its wide data management features, providing longer-term value for complex projects.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Data Quality Management vs. Syniti Data Quality Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Data Quality Management vs. Syniti Data Quality

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Data Quality Management

Ranking in Data Quality

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Syniti Data Quality

Ranking in Data Quality

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of SAP Data Quality Management is 3.1%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Syniti Data Quality is 4.2%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Syniti Data Quality	4.2%
SAP Data Quality Management	3.1%
Other	92.7%

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

VenkatB

Director at Norderia

Embrace efficient data management with integrated features but anticipate some enhancement needs

This tool itself is new. SAP Data Quality Management was brought in by SAP recently, maybe a year or two years back. We just started implementing and we still have not heard exact feedback from the client. It would not be correct if I give feedback now because I don't have accurate feedback from client usage. I feel it is a good tool with some limitations. We compared it with Celonis, which is also one of the other tools in the market. I am more into SAP and S4 HANA, so I am not familiar with all the best tools available in Data Quality Management which can be compatible with SAP. We know there are issues with SAP Data Quality Management. The advantage of this tool that SAP brought is that it is already in-built. You don't need to build another application layer on top of the existing one. The compatibility and response time for these applications within the same database is faster.

Read full review

Raj AB

Delivery Head at ApikinFotech

Offers predefined rules and easy to migrate data with minimum customisation of rules

The customization of the data needs improvement. We need to build basic SQL queries rather than being able to do it within the tool. We need to be able to analyze the SQL queries and then rerun them based on customer usage. We should be able to tune the existing process by using simple SQL queries based on the customer's requirements. In future releases, I would like to see more features around Preload and postload reports. From the end-user point of view, it is not very feasible to read. I need to know how the data has been migrated. I need to know whether the complete data has been migrated, only the required data has been migrated, and how it was migrated. So the postload reports will give validation between the source data and the target source. It would give exact picture of the data migration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very important for our products."

"Scalability is good."

"Our primary use case is for us to inspect the results from the product and material, and for releasing or leaving the status of the product."

"The major benefits of Syniti Data Quality stem from the productivity and flexibility it offers to users."

"With Syniti Data Quality, you can integrate SAP and directly fix errors from Syniti Data Quality instead of logging into SAP and then fixing them."

"The customer service and support is good."

"Syniti has built-in 80% of the solution, and we only need to customize 20 to 25% of the features. It is easy to run and pre-load reports."

Cons

"SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management."

"There are some limitations. They are not covering complete scenarios for all the modules."

"I would like for them to develop a feature to able to record all of our inspections; so all the data can go through SAP. It's not user-friendly or easy to get further analysis, so we mostly skip this step."

"It would be good if Syniti Data Quality could integrate more AI in the future."

"The customization of the data needs improvement. We need to build basic SQL queries rather than being able to do it within the tool. We need to be able to analyze the SQL queries and then rerun them based on customer usage."

"The loading mechanisms and administration processes, particularly in setting up connections and deploying the system, need improvement."

"In Syniti Data Quality, data extraction is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Consumer Goods Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SAP Data Quality Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Data Quality Management?

Currently, one of our clients is seeking SAP Data Quality Management solutions, so we are exploring options in that area. The product is not mature yet, so they need to work to improve it. We are a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAP Data Quality Management?

For smaller organizations, I don't think this much is required. If it is a bigger size client from a business point of view, I definitely recommend this tool. They can use it if they are already us...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 24% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 16% of the time

SAP Information Steward vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 16% of the time

Datactics Data Quality Manager vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 12% of the time

Innovative Systems eLation Platform vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP Data Quality Management Competitors

SAP Data Services vs Syniti Data Quality

Compared 63% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Syniti Data Quality

Compared 19% of the time

SAP Information Steward vs Syniti Data Quality

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Syniti Data Quality

Compared 7% of the time

More Syniti Data Quality Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Quality

December 2025

Download SAP Data Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Quality

December 2025

Download Syniti Data Quality product report

Also Known As

SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management, BusinessObjects Data Quality Management

Syniti DQ

Overview

SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management, version for SAP solutions (DQM for SAP), enables you to embed support for data quality directly into SAP ERP,CRM and MDG applications. Start by entering a new customer, supplier, or partner record using the SAP ERP, SAP CRM , SAP MDG applications. Then this version of SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management software corrects components of the address, validates the address based on referential data sources, and formats the address according to the norms of the applicable country. This solution helps in avoiding the duplicate entities entering into your SAP ERP, CRM and MDG applications(supports different MDG data models for address validation and duplicate checks) and also helps in searching and improving your existing data.

SAP

Data quality management solutions from Syniti provide a simplified and cost-effective approach. They create a closed-loop remediation process owned by business users that monitors and accurately remediates data that violates your standards for data quality.

Syniti

Sample Customers

AOK Bundesverband, Surgutneftegas Open Joint Stock Company, Molson Coors Brewing Company, City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International, Wªrth Group, Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba, R

Kraft Foods, Puget Sound Energy

Buyer's Guide

SAP Data Quality Management vs. Syniti Data Quality

December 2025

Free Report: SAP Data Quality Management vs. Syniti Data Quality

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Data Quality Management vs. Syniti Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Data Quality Management vs. Syniti Data Quality report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.