We performed a comparison between SAP Customer Identity and Access Management and WSO2 Identity Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Omada, Ping Identity and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)."Seamless integration is the most valuable feature. There is a there is some functionality where you could go and be enabled and disable everything, you can do it with no time."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is the provisioning of a lot of SAP systems. It offers automated provisioning."
"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."
"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
"Comprehensive ecosystem."
"The solution gets the job done, and we don't have to do the main configuration."
"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."
"It's very easy to implement everything."
"The keystore feature has been most valuable for us."
"The automated provisioning only works well with the SAP products and there are some problems with the non-SAP products. Even if it is SAP, if it is a non-ABAP system, it is a little bit problematic."
"Only component, I would think the database is inbuilt. So you could use only SAP provided the API to extract. And there is one channel I experienced during the data migration, which is which allow us to create the customer or delete the Customer. And it won't allow for any change. The data migration needs improvement."
"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."
"The solution seems to be pretty outdated."
"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."
"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."
"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."
"The high availability architecture has to be improved."
"I found the initial setup to be very complex."
"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."
More SAP Customer Identity and Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is ranked 9th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 2 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 6th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 8 reviews. SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is rated 8.6, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Customer Identity and Access Management writes "A set of tools that allows you to manage user access to the Fiori apps and specify what users can do and see in the apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "Provides easy integration with other tools". SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is most compared with Auth0 and Salesforce Identity, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with Auth0, Amazon Cognito, SAP Identity Management, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM).
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.
We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
