SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs Teradata comparison

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Read 77 Teradata reviews

10,160 Views
2,946 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 30, 2025

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and Teradata compete in advanced database management solutions. Teradata seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, despite SAP's favorable pricing and support.

Features: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is strong in transaction processing, high availability, and integration. Teradata offers large-scale analytics, complex query processing, and scalability. The distinction is SAP's efficiency in transaction-centric applications versus Teradata's capability in expansive data analysis.

Room for Improvement: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise could improve in updating features and handling expansive data sets. Teradata may benefit from simplified deployment processes and cost-effective scalability options. SAP's integration can be more seamless, and Teradata could enhance user accessibility and simplify analytics operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is noted for straightforward deployment and strong support, making it favorable for cost-conscious businesses. Teradata's deployment is more complex but offers advanced analytics capabilities, focusing on performance and detailed data analysis.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise typically offers lower setup costs and direct ROI, appealing to budget-sensitive users. Teradata requires a higher initial investment but justifies it with advanced features and analytical capabilities, targeting data-driven enterprises seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. Teradata Report (Updated: September 2025).

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. Teradata

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,019 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Backup and Recovery (21st), Data Integration (17th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (13th), Marketing Management (5th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 4.5%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Teradata	4.5%
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise	1.0%
Other	94.5%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Offers cost-efficiency as it needs a very small amount of RAM to function

SAP is least bothered about Adaptive Server Enterprise nowadays since it wants to focus on promoting its new product, which is S/4HANA. If SAP gives out new releases and a patch upgrade to improve performance and provide additional options, then SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can compete with other relational database systems in the market. The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve. I work in a very stable environment, and I prefer a very stable replication and database management system. Most of our company's customers do not want to opt out of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, but SAP has announced that it will be ending its support for it in 2027, and though I feel SAP might extend it, I feel SAP will want to promote its new product. Previously, I heard that SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's end-of-support dates were announced for 2025, but now I think that they have extended it to 2027 or 2030.

Read full review

Kirk Robinson

Interim and Fractional CIO and CTO at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Has improved data quality, optimized reporting processes, and enabled predictive insights across business units

The limitation we encountered was related to speed, prompting us to increase our AWS cloud thresholds and benchmarks on the servers, adding more throughput. We have been testing that, but speed remains one of our key issues. The integration has been awesome because of the platforms and their usage, and usability is great. The most challenging aspect is finding Teradata resources, so we are focusing on internal training and looking for more Teradata experts. If Teradata could provide a list of certified experts, that would be fantastic. I rated Teradata a nine because the main area for improvement is the bandwidth of resources that could assist us in applying to our projects, specifically more certified and expert resources. The market share of Teradata professionals is limited, creating an issue for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."

"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."

"It's pretty good at handling a large number of transactions, which is critical for a banking client."

"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."

"They provide easy integration with other systems."

"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."

"Provides very good integration."

"The actual interface is good."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise pros

"The functionality of the solution is excellent."

"It is a solid database a lot of different tools to move data."

"It's a pre-configured appliance that requires very little in terms of setting-up."

"The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security."

"Teradata can be deployed on-premise, on the cloud, or in a virtual machine, which means customers can move without having to create their architecture all over again."

"It handles large amounts of information with a linear performance increase, in relation to a HW investment."

"When it comes to integration, tools like Informatica seamlessly connect with Teradata. We ensure the Teradata database is configured correctly in Informatica, including the proper hostname and properties for the load process. We didn't find any major complexity or issues with integration."

"Teradata is a great, industry-leading data warehousing product that has MPP architecture."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."

"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."

"User interface could be more user friendly."

"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."

"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."

"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."

"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."

"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise cons

"There is some improvement required on OLTP level and some analytical function is missing."

"The following could be better: licensing, architecture openness, integration with other tools."

"The SQL Assistant is very basic. This tool can be improved for usability."

"Query language and its functionality are rather limited, compared to Oracle or even SQL Server. However, it is possible to perform any kind of logic in it (though some workarounds may be required)."

"When backups are performed, it locks the database, preventing user access, which is a concern."

"An additional feature I would you like to see included in the next release, is that it needs to be more cloud-friendly."

"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."

"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low."

"Price-wise, the product is worth it since one needs very less infrastructure to use it."

"I rate SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's pricing a six out of ten."

"Teradata is a very expensive solution."

"The price of Teradata is on the higher side, and I think that it where they lose out on some of their business."

"The price of Teradata is expensive. However, what they deliver they are outstanding. If you're looking for an inexpensive solution to run a database, this isn't your tool. It's the Ferrari of databases for data warehousing."

"The cost of running Teradata is quite high, but you get a good return on investment."

"We had a lot of parties involved when purchasing from the AWS Marketplace. They are very flexible and aggressive in trying to close the deal. They are good at what they have to offer and listening to the customer. It's a two-way street."

"Teradata's licensing is on the expensive side."

"Make sure you have the in-house skills to design and support the solution, as relying on external sources is extremely costly and tends to lock you into specific platforms, tools, and paradigms."

"Teradata pricing is fine, and it's competitive with all the legacy models. On a scale of one to five, with one being the worst and five being the best, I'm giving Teradata a three, because it can be a little expensive, when compared to other solutions."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low when you compare it with Microsoft SQL Server. If you compare it with SQL Server, it is pretty low.

What needs improvement with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The main thing is it's not getting upgraded to meet today's needs. It's not upgrading at the level of transaction needs. For example, PostgreSQL or Oracle, these are pretty good databases. They can...

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

SAP HANA vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Comparisons

Compared 36% of the time

SAP IQ vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Database vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

SAP SQL Anywhere vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

October 2025

Download SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise product report

Download Teradata product report

October 2025

Also Known As

SAP ASE

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture, Teradata Vantage Enterprise (DIY)

Overview

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a high-performance relational database management system designed for mission-critical, data-intensive environments. It provides a centralized environment for storing and managing data, with the ability to handle a wide range of data types and a modularization technique allowing easy customization.

SAP ASE is particularly valuable for financial operations, as it offers integrated financial features. The solution also offers various control agents and the ability to match code and database index. SAP ASE has improved daily data collection and program functionality for many organizations.

SAP

Teradata is a powerful tool for handling substantial data volumes with its parallel processing architecture, supporting both cloud and on-premise environments efficiently. It offers impressive capabilities for fast query processing, data integration, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications.

Known for its robust parallel processing capabilities, Teradata effectively manages large datasets and provides adaptable deployment across cloud and on-premise setups. It enhances performance and scalability with features like advanced query tuning, workload management, and strong security. Users appreciate its ease of use and automation features which support real-time data reporting. The optimizer and intelligent partitioning help improve query speed and efficiency, while multi-temperature data management optimizes data handling.

What are the key features of Teradata?

Parallel Processing Architecture: Enables efficient handling of substantial data volumes.
Cloud and On-Premise Deployment: Offers seamless adaptability across environments.
Query Tuning: Improves speed and performance of data retrieval processes.
Workload Management: Ensures optimal resource allocation for enhanced performance.
Robust Security: Provides high levels of data protection and system integrity.
Data Integration: Facilitates cohesive data management from multiple sources.
Automation for Real-time Reporting: Enhances timely data insights and decision-making.
Optimizer and Intelligent Partitioning: Further increase query speed and system efficiency.
Multi-Temperature Data Management: Optimizes the handling and retrieval of data.

What benefits and ROI do users look for?

Efficient Data Management: Facilitates smooth integration and processing of diverse data sets.
Scalability: Easy adjustment to increasing or decreasing data requirements.
Improved Performance: Fast query speeds and optimized resource use.
Comprehensive Security: Safeguards data integrity and accessibility.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data handling and operational processes.

In the finance, retail, and government sectors, Teradata is employed for data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytical processing. It handles vast datasets for activities like customer behavior modeling and enterprise data integration. Supporting efficient reporting and analytics, Teradata enhances data storage and processing, whether deployed on-premise or on cloud platforms.

Sample Customers

City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY

Netflix