We performed a comparison between SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"Provides very good integration."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"The flexibility in design is very good."
"I've never had any issues with scalability."
"It's a pre-configured appliance that requires very little in terms of setting-up."
"The performance is great, we are able to query our data in one operation."
"Teradata's most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"Teradata features high productivity and reliability because it has several redundancy options, so the system is always up and running."
"The functionality of the solution is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"Teradata's pricing is quite high compared to Redshift, Synapse, or GCP alternatives."
"I would like to see more integration with many different types of data."
"The setup is not straightforward."
"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."
"It could use some more advanced analytics relating to structured and semi-structured data."
"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."
"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."
"I've been using the same UI for 20 years in Teradata. It could use some updating. Adding more stability around Teradata Studio would be outstanding. Teradata Studio is a Java-based version of their tool. It's much better now, but it still has some room for improvement."
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 3 reviews while Teradata is ranked 5th in Relational Databases Tools with 16 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes "Provides integration and ease of access to reporting; UI could be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Very fast with good database control and excellent support". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SQL Server, SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, Oracle Database and SAP SQL Anywhere, whereas Teradata is most compared with Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, SQL Server, Vertica and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
