Safeguard by One Identity vs Securonix UEBA comparison

Why PeerSpot?

One Identity and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. One Identity is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #15. One Identity holds a 2.8% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 90 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,011 Views
2,533 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Securonix UEBA

Read 4 Securonix UEBA reviews

1,557 Views
1,417 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Securonix UEBA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Securonix UEBA provide advanced security solutions in distinct areas, with Securonix UEBA offering a superior feature set for innovative analytics and One Identity Safeguard providing cost-effective options that are appealing to budget-focused decision-makers.

Features:One Identity Safeguard is known for its strong privileged access management, user-friendly management interface, and detailed auditing capabilities. Securonix UEBA stands out with behavioral analytics, AI-driven insights, and robust threat detection tools, making it attractive for managing complex security threats.

Room for Improvement:One Identity Safeguard could benefit from refining its feature set for more complex threat scenarios and expanding its behavioral analytics capabilities. Securonix UEBA might enhance ease of use and offer more streamlined deployment processes, reducing its initial learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:One Identity Safeguard integrates easily with existing IT structures, offering responsive customer support and shorter implementation times. Securonix UEBA, while scalable, requires more configuration and training to maximize its functionality, but it is adaptable to diverse environments.

Pricing and ROI:One Identity Safeguard provides transparent pricing with competitive structures, facilitating a predictable ROI. Securonix UEBA, although higher in cost, justifies its price with a comprehensive analytical toolkit, offering potential long-term benefits for those prioritizing comprehensive threat intelligence.

To learn more, read our detailed Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,952 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Securonix UEBA

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

15th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 2.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	2.8%
Securonix UEBA	2.6%
Other	94.6%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Yoganantham Theerthagiri

Regional Channel Manager at i2sBusiness Solutions

User threat notification and behavior analysis have been enhanced through effective AI-based monitoring

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics. The customizable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable."

"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."

"One Identity Safeguard makes password manageability easy and helps us monitor and reduce manual tasks such as auditing and improving log visibility, while also providing compliance-based reporting for our upper management."

"Customer Service: absolutely perfect Technical Support: Technical support is 10/10, absolutely."

"Two-factor authentication has saved us from a couple of brute force attacks on a couple of our C-level executives."

"There is ease of implementation."

"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution."

"Overall, I have had a positive experience with Safeguard by One Identity, as the biggest benefit for us is strong control over privileged access, along with session monitoring and auditing capabilities, which has helped improve security and streamline privileged account management."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

"ROI is evident. The ROI is there from cost optimization and everything else."

"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."

"The most valuable features of Securonix UEBA include insider threat monitoring, which provides complete visibility of user activities, and next-gen AI-based behavior analytics."

"We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best."

Cons

"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."

"One Identity Safeguard could be improved with a more user-friendly interface and simpler initial setup, as the learning curve can be somewhat steep."

"We have not had any issues with the core product itself, but there is an add-on called SCALUS, which is quite critical to the user experience, and that does not work. They have been having issues with that for quite a long time, like months. That is not great at all."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

"The area that needs improvement is reporting."

"The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved."

"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."

"The support system is not very good as of now."

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."

"The cost is approximately $50 per user per year."

"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	88
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

Our experience with the pricing and licensing was generally positive. The initial setup costs were reasonable considering the security and access control benefits we are getting. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

I think Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the user interface a little simpler and more intuitive, especially for new administrators. Some configurations and advanced features ta...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is to manage a secure privileged account and access a critical system. It helps us to control who can access sensitive resources and monitor privilege...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securonix UEBA?

The integration with other tools, like EDRs and other technology tools, can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix UEBA?

My primary use case for Securonix UEBA is user threat notification and user behavior analysis.

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Haystax Analytics Platform vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Behavioral Signals vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 14% of the time

ArcSight Analytics vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Securonix UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

More Securonix UEBA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

August 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix UEBA

August 2026

Download Securonix UEBA product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics

Overview

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Securonix UEBA delivers powerful user behavior analytics with intuitive dashboards and advanced threat detection algorithms.

Securonix UEBA aggregates diverse use case data into organized dashboards, visualizing trends and enabling cross-organization comparisons. Advanced algorithms detect insider threats and anomalies, ensuring comprehensive user activity visibility. Continuous enhancements through new policies and custom rules support thorough monitoring and investigation, while cyber analytics algorithms differentiate it in the market. Improvements are needed in algorithm enhancement, integration with EDRs and packages, and reporting emphasis.

What are the key features of Securonix UEBA?

Comprehensive Aggregation Library: Covers various use cases with ease.
Intuitive Dashboards: Organized for clear data visualization.
Advanced Algorithms: Detect insider threats accurately.
AI-Based Behavior Analytics: Full visibility into user activities.
Customizable Dashboards: Supports tailored monitoring and investigation.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Securonix UEBA?

Insider Threat Detection: Identify threats efficiently.
User Activity Monitoring: Continuous insights into user behavior.
Behavior Analysis: Differentiates normal from suspicious patterns.
Comprehensive Threat Notifications: Delivers timely alerts.

Organizations use Securonix UEBA in insider threat detection and behavior analysis, assisting in lateral movement, ransomware, and malware detection. It's used for network traffic observation in scenarios such as data exportation by contractors or abnormal account access, typically in appliance-based setups within data centers, offering thorough user threat notifications and behavior analysis tailored to industry needs.

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

Cavium

Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA

August 2026

Free Report: Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA

Find out what your peers are saying about Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Safeguard by One Identity vs. Securonix UEBA report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.