We performed a comparison between Riskified and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
Earn 20 points
Riskified is ranked 4th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 3 reviews while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Riskified is rated 9.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Riskified writes "Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". Riskified is most compared with Forter, Kount, Amazon Fraud Detector, Accertify Interceptas and Signifyd, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
