Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs Remote Desktop with Multi-user support by Aurora comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (2nd), AI Code Assistants (5th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (2nd), AI Proofreading Tools (2nd)
Remote Desktop with Multi-u...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Operating Systems (OS) for Business (52nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise and Remote Desktop with Multi-user support by Aurora aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is designed for Large Language Models (LLMs) and holds a mindshare of 9.2%, up 6.5% compared to last year.
Remote Desktop with Multi-user support by Aurora, on the other hand, focuses on Operating Systems (OS) for Business, holds 0.1% mindshare, up 0.0% since last year.
Large Language Models (LLMs) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise9.2%
Blackbox.ai16.7%
Google Gemini AI15.5%
Other58.6%
Large Language Models (LLMs)
Operating Systems (OS) for Business Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Remote Desktop with Multi-user support by Aurora0.1%
Rocky Linux11.1%
Ubuntu Linux9.0%
Other79.8%
Operating Systems (OS) for Business
 

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Collaborative workspace has transformed our content creation and daily team productivity
There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior. Teams often want even finer control over how the assistant responds, including industry-specific tones, branding voice, or response constraints that apply only to certain teams within the organization. While the shared workspace is powerful, deeper integration with internal enterprise systems could enhance accuracy and relevance. Current team history features are useful, but some teams want more granular control over what is shared or archived, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. More flexible memory settings at the project or chat level and better usage analytics would be beneficial. Admins often want richer insights into how the team is using the platform, not just overall usage but impact metrics tied to business outcomes. Real-time collaboration is great, but there is room to grow in how teams co-author and annotate AI outputs together. Additional improvements would include domain-specific models. Some teams operate in highly specialized domains and want models tuned to their field. The option to load domain-specific language packs or fine-tuned models within the enterprise environment would be valuable. Teams sometimes want clearer insight into why the assistant responded a certain way, especially on complex queries, so adding an explain-why feature with brief reasoning steps or confidence indicators for responses would improve understanding. For ultra-sensitive deployments, some organizations prefer tools that can run without cloud dependency, so having a secure on-premise or private cloud deployment option with the same collaboration compatibilities would be beneficial. Further improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise include the AI better understanding inter-team context. This would involve recognizing when a query relates to a previous project or department-specific knowledge to reduce repeated explanations or clarifications. While it handles many languages, more robust enterprise-grade multilingual capabilities, including idiomatic expressions and regional business terminologies, would help global teams collaborate more effectively. Allowing the AI to tailor responses based on the user's role makes output more precise and immediately actionable. For highly sensitive projects, having a secure offline mode or on-premises deployment would increase adoption in regulated industries.
Use Remote Desktop with Multi-user support by Aurora?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is currently working well, and I do not see any need for improvements because it handles every project I run without complexity or delay. Everything on ChatGPT Team - Ente...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
My main use case for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is developing and coding, and for team collaboration, we have been using it for content marketing as well as coding. A specific example of how I use C...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
I rate ChatGPT Team - Enterprise a ten out of ten because it is stable, flexible, and fully customizable. It also demonstrates the best functionality and performance so far. I advise others looking...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Blackbox and others in Large Language Models (LLMs). Updated: January 2026.
881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.