No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Reflect vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Reflect
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI Software Development (42nd), AI Quality Assurance (3rd)
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
114
Ranking in other categories
Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Reflect is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 10.7%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca10.7%
Reflect0.8%
Other88.5%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2845779 - PeerSpot reviewer
Gerente De Proyectos at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Automated login and invoice tests have reduced manual effort and now streamline daily workflows
At the moment, I have no complaints about how Reflect could improve. I would not like to add anything else about possible improvements or aspects that could be optimized in the future. I give it a rating of eight because of the help it has given me, but sometimes the test cases do not work well with certain technology. I have already spoken about compatibility improvements with the developers and they told me they are working on it.
AKSHAYRATHI - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior engineer at Nagarro
End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data
I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Reflect has positively impacted my organization by helping to reduce testing time by 80%."
"Tricentis Tosca is different and better, because it has a reusable model, whereas the others do not."
"The automation testing functionality is very powerful."
"It's stable and reliable."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"Risk-based testing, test optimization, and support for over one hundred technologies are some of the most important capabilities of the platform."
"From the commercial tool perspective, Tosca is a leader in every aspect."
"The features I find most valuable in Tricentis Tosca are that it's the easiest way to build the scripts and to do the CI/CD process; using Tricentis Tosca is very useful and easy."
"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."
 

Cons

"I give it a rating of eight because of the help it has given me, but sometimes the test cases do not work well with certain technology."
"At the time I was using the product, the reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"It can be quite expensive."
"I would say the reporting part of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There should be ease of data manipulation within automation test cases."
"Product quality has declined as it grows, and its updates aren't without fault. The process of resolving problems has slowed, and as it expands into other areas like NeoLoad and other testing tools, the product becomes more complicated. It used to be a small firm with a clear goal, but as it grows, the quality has been affected."
"Not part of my job, but during the upgrade our IT departmend faced several issues in the installation process of the new version."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."
"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."
"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."
"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."
"The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle."
"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."
"In terms of the licensing costs for Tricentis Tosca, we are spending more or less $70,000 per year. We have a very complex mechanism because there are some business users and some BI users, so the licensing structure is not simple, but support is included."
"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise75
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Reflect?
At the moment, I have no complaints about how Reflect could improve. I would not like to add anything else about possible improvements or aspects that could be optimized in the future. I give it a ...
What is your primary use case for Reflect?
My main use case for Reflect is test automation. I have a case where I need to automate the login of a tool, and with Reflect, I can automate it for day-to-day use of that test. I can also automate...
What advice do you have for others considering Reflect?
My advice to other professionals considering using Reflect is not to be afraid to try the tool. It is a very useful and easy-to-use tool that is intuitive, and professionals should not be afraid to...
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?
The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Orchestrated Service Virtualization
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: July 2026.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.