Recorded Future vs Threat Hunting Framework comparison

Recorded Future and Group-IB are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. Recorded Future is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Group-IB is ranked #35. Recorded Future holds a 17.6% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Group-IB’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Recorded Future users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Group-IB users who would recommend it.

Recorded Future

Read 13 Recorded Future reviews

6,161 Views
3,463 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Threat Hunting Framework

Read 1 Threat Hunting Framework review

264 Views
178 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Recorded Future

Threat Hunting Framework

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Recorded Future and Threat Hunting Framework are key players in the cybersecurity sector. Recorded Future gains an upper hand with its advanced data analytics and seamless integrations, while Threat Hunting Framework shines in threat detection features despite its higher costs.

Features: Recorded Future provides real-time threat intelligence, predictive analytics, and seamless integration with existing security tools. Threat Hunting Framework offers robust threat hunting capabilities, incident response features, and deeper insights into threat contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support for seamless integration. Threat Hunting Framework may involve a more complex deployment but provides dedicated training and support services.

Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future has a competitive setup cost and offers attractive ROI through enhanced threat intelligence. Threat Hunting Framework might involve higher upfront costs, but its extensive threat detection features potentially mitigate complex threats, providing enhanced long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Recorded Future

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Risk Protection (1st)

Threat Hunting Framework

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms

35th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Recorded Future is 17.6%, down from 18.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Threat Hunting Framework is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms

Featured Reviews

Dr. Merrick Watchorn

Chief Executive Officer at The Watchorn Innovation Group, Inc. (TWIGI)

Traceless online searches, stable, and scalable

There is a semantic oncology dynamic relationship between how the MIGR Tech framework needs more data infusion enrichment capabilities. To be clear, what the vendor is doing is of a high standard, and my only critique is that they need to make new enhancements. I am aware that the vendor is making a concerted effort to add additional information to their repository, and it is something they actively do. The vendor has publicly stated that they will work on this, and I always pay attention to make sure they adhere to that. This does not change over time. The export feature of the recording needs to stop being so restricted. When they record in order to save themselves by operations, I would expect that as a super user, if I asked to download the dataset I'm looking for, I would not be limited in my data downloads. One of the cool things is, let's say we do our entire research and we want to save all of the materials that were returned, and that special custom search that we made, we can export that into a CSV file. The problem is it gets restricted. So sometimes when I say it's restricted, we don't get all the data that we saw online. So then we have to go and manually search for the specific thing we're looking for. I would like to have the URI and whatever value set that I search off, and for the NLP package to not be stripped out. It's like saying I want to do a Pcap analysis. Don't strip out the Pcap when I asked to see Pcap. That's what they're doing. They do this for many different reasons. One of them is, imagine if everyone downloaded datasets that are very large and it brings the whole system down.

Read full review

John Rendy

CTO at systema

High fidelity cyber incident detection is near in real-time, enabling proactive & timely mitigation efforts

The nature of the system means it has to be implemented throughout the organizations. You need to implement it on the network layer, the email layer, the web proxy layer, and also the endpoints. Nevertheless, endpoint monitoring is very challenging due to the lack of automated method to install the endpoint agents. In one of our customer case, we have about 40,000 endpoints and we need to have a simplified method of deployment if we're going to implement the endpoint monitoring effectively. Product features also need some improvement in creating custom signatures for detection because that is not open to customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool can integrate with a lot of security control and proactive protection devices."

"Recorded Future allows me to maintain very accurate alerts."

"From the feedback I've received from my clients, the most valuable feature is the ability to personalize the solution. The ability to have a customized dashboard makes it easy for leadership and management to obtain details. Intelligence analysts or security engineers care about the actions and results, whereas the leadership care about graphs and reports. Recorded Future helps my clients create reports and also determine how the intelligence that is generated is consumed. They can easily show the benefits to the leadership without them having to invest 10 hours a week into transferring numbers into a graph or into creating reports."

"Has the ability to conduct and build any query without limitations."

"The most valuable feature of Recorded Future is how it detects everything regarding our domain."

"The tool is helpful in vulnerability assessment of zero-day vulnerabilities and phishing domains. The solution provides information on any domains of the organization that has undergone phishing or any other cyberattacks."

"The solution is diverse and provides me with a lot of different mechanisms for evaluation."

"As a threat intelligence tool, it's very helpful."

More Recorded Future pros

"Great automatic correlation of all internal activities."

Cons

"There is a semantic oncology dynamic relationship between how the MIGR Tech framework needs more data infusion enrichment capabilities."

"The customer support is frustrating and not efficient. They always request logs and screenshots that seem irrelevant."

"When you add one website to Recorded Future, it should automatically call all other websites and social media platforms."

"Lacks sufficient visibility of malware and international APT attacks."

"We can get the data of different malware active throughout the globe, but it would be good if we can do sandboxing of a file. For example, on Any Run, we can perform sandboxing of malware along with their intel about a particular file or hash. It would be great if they have a feature like that."

"At present, my clients need to be trained by me or another organization on how to use Recorded Future and how to get the best out of it as an analyst, engineer, and administrator. It would be better if clients could directly learn these things without having to go through me or other organizations."

"Recorded Future is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"The solution could improve in reducing the false positives. However, most of the other tools on the market have false positives. If they enhance their data algorithm, it could improve the accuracy of results and minimize false positives. Identifying patterns of false possibilities can aid in developing better reporting features that could potentially eliminate them in the future. This recording feature tool could benefit from adopting similar techniques utilized by other tools to enhance its functionality. By doing so, it could minimize the need for manual efforts in distinguishing true positives from false positives, ultimately reducing the workload."

More Recorded Future cons

"Monitoring the endpoint could be improved, it requires a huge effort."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten."

"There appear to be up to five different levels, with the most expensive version costing around $95,000 to $105,000 a year for subscription services."

"The biggest disadvantage of Recorded Future is the cost here in Eastern Europe. The solution is correctly priced for big companies who have the money to invest in such solutions. Also, the solution is useless on its own, which means that you have to invest in other solutions with which Recorded Future can be integrated. At present, Recorded Future can cost 60,000 euros per year. I am able to offer my clients a 5% to 10% discount, but in this region, the cost is still prohibitive even with the discount. If Recorded Future were more flexible in terms of price, there would be better sales opportunities in Europe and Eastern Europe, in particular, because we have more small- and medium-sized companies here."

"The price of the solution is worth it. The overall performance of the solution outweighs the cost."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Recorded Future?

The most valuable feature of Recorded Future is how it detects everything regarding our domain.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?

I am not the person responsible for purchases, but it's known that Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Recorded Future?

Their research capabilities and the human aspect should be more effective. The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs. Their research should be wider and more i...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Recorded Future

Compared 13% of the time

ZeroFOX vs Recorded Future

Compared 8% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Recorded Future

Compared 7% of the time

Intel 471 vs Recorded Future

Compared 7% of the time

Digital Shadows vs Recorded Future

Compared 6% of the time

More Recorded Future Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Threat Hunting Framework

Compared 100% of the time

More Threat Hunting Framework Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Recorded Future

April 2025

Download Recorded Future product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms

April 2025

Download Threat Hunting Framework product report

Overview

Recorded Future is a powerful and effective cyber threat intelligence (CTI) platform that aims to empower administrators to protect their organizations from threats, both known and unknown. The machine learning engine that Recorded Future utilizes can process the same amount of data that 9,000 analysts working five days a week, eight hours a day for an entire year can process. It simplifies threat detection and remediation so that organizations can focus on other tasks.

Recorded Future Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Recorded Future include:

Quick threat identification and resolution. The suite of threat detection and resolution features that Recorded Future provides enables users to find and react to threats faster than users who employ their competitors. Organizations can identify 22 times more threats 10 times faster than they would have been able to with any other solution. They can also resolve these threats 63% faster than they were able to before.

Access far-reaching deep insights. Recorded Future gives users the ability to expand their vision beyond that which is immediately visible to them. They can set Recorded Future to detect issues that originate outside of the immediate vicinity of their network. Organizations can utilize machine learning to analyze for links between themselves and the dark web. This provides users insights as to what their vulnerabilities are and gives them insights that they can use to remediate any issues that have arisen or will arise.

Customization. Organizations can integrate Recorded Future with a wide variety of other security tools. If the organization feels that Recorded Future is lacking the capability that they need, then it can expand its toolbox by combining it with other solutions. Additionally, users can easily create dashboards and modify them to best meet their objectives as their needs change.

Recorded Future Features

Some of the many features Recorded Future offers include:

Vulnerability scanning tools. Recorded Future is built with the ability to scan for, identify, and score potential vulnerabilities in real time. It searches a wide variety of sources for information on the risks that an organization faces. This information is analyzed and scored for severity in real time. These tools enable users to prioritize the most severe threats over those issues that will only be nuisances.

Threat authentication. Users can set security protocols that Recorded Future leverages to reduce false positives. It has tools that compare the detected threats against the organization’s protocols. This allows the system to notify administrators whether they are looking at an actual threat or simply a mistake that the system initially misidentified.

Attack surface intelligence. Organizations gain the ability to see the points of vulnerability that would normally be invisible to them and would only be visible to outside attackers. This tool fully exposes the environment that surrounds their network. Everything from historical data going as far back as 10 years to real-time information is gathered so that administrators can create the best possible security strategy for their organization.

Reviews from Real Users

Recorded future is a solution that stands out when compared to its top competitors. Two major advantages it offers are the threat research tools that it provides and the threat monitoring capabilities that it enables users to leverage.

A security operations lead at a comms service provider writes, “Recorded Future covers a lot of different use cases. For example, we are using it for threat intelligence research. We do use the tool to make active research on what is found around the threat. We look at patterns, for example, and see what can be elaborated on from that.”

They also write, “We can also use it for active monitoring in the customer interface. We can monitor the business side of a campaign. We can monitor for specific threats or market activity on the dashboard. We can develop queries to run in a continuous mode in order to get the best reviews.”

Recorded Future

Group-IB is a Singapore-based provider of solutions aimed at the detection and prevention of cyberattacks and online fraud. The company also specializes in high-profile cyber investigations and IP protection services. Group-IB’s Threat Intelligence & Attribution system has been named one of the best in class by Gartner, Forrester, and IDC, while its Threat Hunting Framework has been recognized as one of the leaders in Network Detection and Response.
Group-IB’s technological leadership is built on the company’s 18 years of hands-on experience in cybercrime investigations around the world and 65 000 hours of cybersecurity incident response accumulated in one of the biggest forensic laboratory and a round-the-clock center providing a rapid response to cyber incidents — CERT-GIB.
Group-IB is a partner of INTERPOL, Europol, and has been recommended by the OSCE as a cybersecurity solutions provider.

Group-IB

Sample Customers

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.