Qlik Compose vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Qlik and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #48, while SAP is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.0. Qlik holds a 1.0% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,724 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

1,612 Views
951 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Qlik Compose compete in data integration and replication within enterprise environments. SAP Replication Server holds an advantage in high-speed, real-time data replication, while Qlik Compose shines in data transformation and modeling capabilities.

Features: SAP Replication Server offers real-time data replication, high-speed data handling across heterogeneous systems, and strong reliability in transactional processing environments. Qlik Compose excels in data integration with automation features, advanced data modeling, and data transformation flexibility.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could benefit from a simplified deployment process, reduced setup complexity, and enhanced user interface. Qlik Compose may improve by expanding its data integration completeness, offering more detailed training resources, and refining scalability options for larger datasets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose generally provides a smoother deployment experience with intuitive configuration and positive customer support. SAP Replication Server, while equipped with strong documentation, may require more expertise for effective setup but supports established enterprise environments well.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server's setup costs can be high, but it delivers substantial ROI through efficient data replication for stable environments. Qlik Compose offers a more flexible pricing structure, providing cost-effectiveness and significant ROI by optimizing data automation and transformation processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP Replication Server	0.8%
Qlik Compose	1.0%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

reviewer1834542

Finance Business Process Improvement, Transformation and Project Management at a consultancy with self employed

Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage

The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades. As a company, you're either hiring or paying an outsourcer to do that, and you have to manage it, keep up with the updates to the hardware, software, and the operating system. It's very expensive because there's a lot to control and take care of.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Qlik Compose is good enough; it is user-friendly and intuitive."

More Qlik Compose pros

"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

"Setup was a little complex."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

17%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?

It's a pretty good product and stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?

It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Airbyte Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 10% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Backup and Recovery for Salesforce vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

March 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

March 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server

March 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.