Qlik Compose vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Qlik and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #51, while SAP is ranked #52. Qlik holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,450 Views
2,034 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

3,081 Views
1,725 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Qlik Compose compete in data integration and replication within enterprise environments. SAP Replication Server holds an advantage in high-speed, real-time data replication, while Qlik Compose shines in data transformation and modeling capabilities.

Features: SAP Replication Server offers real-time data replication, high-speed data handling across heterogeneous systems, and strong reliability in transactional processing environments. Qlik Compose excels in data integration with automation features, advanced data modeling, and data transformation flexibility.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could benefit from a simplified deployment process, reduced setup complexity, and enhanced user interface. Qlik Compose may improve by expanding its data integration completeness, offering more detailed training resources, and refining scalability options for larger datasets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose generally provides a smoother deployment experience with intuitive configuration and positive customer support. SAP Replication Server, while equipped with strong documentation, may require more expertise for effective setup but supports established enterprise environments well.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server's setup costs can be high, but it delivers substantial ROI through efficient data replication for stable environments. Qlik Compose offers a more flexible pricing structure, providing cost-effectiveness and significant ROI by optimizing data automation and transformation processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

52nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Compose	0.8%
SAP Replication Server	0.9%
Other	98.3%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

GagandeepSingh3

Principal Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Good at handling replication, provides cross-database replication but SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"It's a stable solution."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"It is a scalable solution."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It can scale."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"There could be more customization options."

More Qlik Compose cons

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"Setup was a little complex."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

June 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

June 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

SAP Replication Server offers enhanced data replication for SAP databases with customizable workflows, real-time updates, improved efficiency, and seamless integration with external tools, catering to both private and hybrid cloud solutions.

SAP Replication Server facilitates effective cross-database replication, including Sybase to Oracle, while enhancing performance with reduced storage use. Despite its robust reliability and beginner-friendly setup, areas such as high transactional processing and cross-database integration to newer technologies require improvement. Integration with HANA and addressing high private instance costs are necessary. The platform supports heterogeneous database communication and is a valuable asset in finance, banking, and analytics across platforms like AWS, Azure, and IBM.

What features does SAP Replication Server offer?

Customizable Workflows: Tailor workflows to meet business domain modeling needs.
Real-Time Replication: Ensure database updates are replicated instantly.
Cross-Database Support: Facilitate data movement between Sybase, Oracle, and more.
Warm Standby: Allows seamless read/write access during failover.
Easy Setup: Access beginner-friendly setup with comprehensive online resources.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and enhances performance.
Robust Reliability: Ensures dependable data replication processes.
Cross-Platform Integration: Works well with modern platforms for a diverse tech stack.
Business Continuity: Maintains operations with features like Warm Standby.

Organizations in data analytics, finance, and banking sectors utilize SAP Replication Server to streamline database replication and communication, optimizing processes across AWS, Azure, and IBM. Employee data replication for payroll and business management is simplified, supporting hybrid cloud deployments.

SAP

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server

June 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.