• Home
  • Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs. WAPPLES

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs WAPPLES comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall and WAPPLES based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Good feature set and is simple to deploy
Use WAPPLES?
Ranking
40th
out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
143
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
42nd
out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
135
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Pulse vWAF, Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Learn More
Ivanti
Penta Security Systems
Overview

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall delivers scalable application security for off-the-shelf and custom applications, including third-party frameworks. Apply business rules to online traffic, inspect and block attacks such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS), and filter outgoing traffic and data to mask credit card data. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall helps achieve compliance with PCI-DSS requirements.

WAPPLES is a virtual web application firewall designed for the cloud consumer. WAPPLES runs on an intelligent logic analysis engine called Contents Classification and Evaluation Processing, or COCEP. This logic analysis engine utilizes a system of 26 'rules' to execute a logical analysis of all types of web traffic to determine whether or not certain traffic constitutes a threat to the web application. If traffic can successfully pass through all 26 rules, WAPPLES determines that the traffic is not an attack, and transports legitimate traffic to the web application. The split-second performance of the COCEP enables WAPPLES to determine if traffic is safe in just 1/1000 of a second.
Sample Customers
Gilt Groupe
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm16%
Government8%
Performing Arts7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 40th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while WAPPLES is ranked 42nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0, while WAPPLES is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and HAProxy, whereas WAPPLES is most compared with AWS WAF and Symantec Web Application Firewall.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.