We performed a comparison between Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 40th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and HAProxy, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.