

Proofpoint Email Protection and Sophos Phish Threat compete in the email security category. Proofpoint appears to have more comprehensive security features, while Sophos has a strong focus on user education and reliability.
Features: Proofpoint Email Protection offers advanced phishing and spam protection, business email compromise defense, and a robust filtering system. Its capacity to handle complex attachments and provide detailed threat intelligence makes it notable. Sophos Phish Threat is distinguished by its focus on user education, offering training on identifying phishing attempts. It enhances user security awareness, combining a simple interface with effective training tools.
Room for Improvement: Proofpoint could improve by enhancing integration capabilities with complex environments, refining its search functions, and optimizing the user interface. It needs better pricing strategies and enhanced detection of emails with non-malicious links. Sophos Phish Threat could be improved by supporting more languages in training materials, simulating modern phishing scenarios, and advancing AI-based detection. Users also want better integration with other security systems and more detailed reporting features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Proofpoint provides a range of deployment options including public, private, hybrid, and on-premises cloud configurations, giving organizations flexibility. Though its technical support is generally well-regarded, improvements in response speed and local assistance are suggested. Sophos Phish Threat, favoring public and on-premises cloud setups, is seen as easy to deploy. Its support is responsive but could benefit from improved staffing and technical knowledge.
Pricing and ROI: Proofpoint Email Protection is perceived as costly but its extensive protection features offer a justified return on investment, particularly in preventing expensive attacks like ransomware. Sophos Phish Threat is considered more affordable, providing cost-effective training and security solutions, though some users find its pricing slightly high compared to other training options. Overall, Proofpoint is seen as a premium offering, while Sophos strikes a balance between cost and functionality.
The ideal situation would be to have all these portals combined into one unified dashboard.
The time required for email investigations and responses has changed with Proofpoint Email Protection's visibility and automation.
If you implement these kinds of solutions in your security stack, the first beneficial thing will be that you will not suffer any malware, and you will not face attacks, which ultimately leads to financial benefit.
I am familiar with the granular policy control feature of Proofpoint Email Protection, and I find their support excellent for modifying those policies.
Even the engineers have been helpful, and if we open a case, they get back to us right away.
We always contact them if we need support, whether it's for setting up features or technical support, which is very responsive.
They call whenever you have an incident and keep calling to assist until you solve the issue.
Proofpoint is scalable for multi-site organizations with thousands of users.
The solution provides a graphical representation and dashboard view showing how many threats are getting blocked on a daily and monthly basis.
Proofpoint Email Protection is considered to be highly scalable, designed for large enterprises, with a cloud-based architecture that offers an enormous number of options, including multi-organization support and high-volume email handling.
If Proofpoint Email Protection has an outage, we are either not receiving emails or not blocking the right threats.
Regarding the stability and performance of Proofpoint Email Protection, I have not experienced any crashes, downtimes, or performance issues.
Proofpoint Email Protection is very stable and reliable, as it remains accessible at all times without issues, ensuring that data is available in real time.
The older legacy user interface just took a little to work with, and the new unified interface, as it was able to do more and more of the functionality of the old one, the product just got easier and easier to use.
In addition to the UI improvements, I would appreciate an increase in the speed of the tasks being processed on the pod.
There are pros and cons to that, but I would suggest maintaining a good balance between security protection and operational impact.
The catalog is very small compared with products such as Terranova or KnowBe4.
Customers pay around $90,000 yearly for a 1,000-user organization, with the subscription license being the main expense, apart from implementation fees.
Given my other experience with other vendors, I think they are a bit on the high end and a bit on the pricey end for the email security functionality that we were using.
Although it is a bit costly compared to Mimecast, Defender, and Cofense Vision, it is efficient and strong in security, so I do not mind the cost because I will not reduce my security risk.
The cost of Sophos Phish Threat is very reasonable for customers as they charge based on usage only.
Without Proofpoint Email Protection, most of these emails would have come through, slipped through Exchange, gotten into the user's mailbox, and created a lot of trouble for the organization.
Proofpoint Email Protection has positively impacted my organization by ensuring we are not at risk of a breach through email.
TAP alerts, where Proofpoint Email Protection scans emails and sends alerts, provide the ability to review suspicious emails and validate them in a sandbox environment.
The integration with Sophos Central benefits us for the management of the phishing campaign by being very user-friendly.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Proofpoint Email Protection | 21.1% |
| Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | 19.9% |
| Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection | 17.1% |
| Other | 41.9% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Sophos Phish Threat | 4.4% |
| KnowBe4 | 16.3% |
| Riot | 7.4% |
| Other | 71.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Proofpoint Email Protection provides powerful filtering against spam, phishing, and malware, leveraging effective threat detection and blocking capabilities. This solution integrates smoothly with platforms like Office 365, offering a user-friendly dashboard for seamless operations.
Proofpoint Email Protection focuses on email security, ensuring protection against phishing, malware, and spam. It includes features like URL scanning, anti-phishing, anti-virus protection, and sandboxing for comprehensive threat analysis. Its advanced analytics through TAP and TRAP, along with strong integration abilities, make it appealing for handling email threats. While scalability and ease of deployment are advantages, challenges such as integration in complex environments, the cost, and limited local support require attention. Enhancements in search functionality, email encryption, and improved phishing detection are also needed.
What are the key features of Proofpoint Email Protection?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Industries adopting Proofpoint Email Protection include finance, healthcare, and education sectors, which benefit from its robust email security measures. Educational institutions prioritize safe communication for staff and students, while healthcare organizations focus on protecting sensitive patient data. Financial services benefit from preventing data breaches and fraud through advanced threats management.
Sophos Phish Threat emulates a range of phishing attack types to help you identify areas of weakness in your organization’s security posture, and empower users through engaging training to strengthen your organizations defenses.
We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.