"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device."
"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."
"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."
"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."
"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."
"The user interface makes it easy to configure and use."
"There is really good visibility for the appliance."
"The solution offers very good visibility."
"The installation is very straightforward."
"The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
"I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device."
"The interface on the cloud could be a bit better - just to give more performance on it."
"I would like to be able to fully customize the reports."
"The difficult thing was finding the metrics."
"The solution could offer more useful documentation."
"In order to provide better management, it would be ideal with they offered better plugins for their firewall."
Portnox CORE is ranked 6th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews while Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 5th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 6 reviews. Portnox CORE is rated 9.4, while Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Great dashboards, easy to set up, and very scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "Great security with a user-friendly interface and excellent stability". Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Aruba ClearPass, whereas Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), ExtremeControl and Ruckus Cloudpath. See our Portnox CORE vs. Sophos Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
