Planview Portfolios vs QualiWare X comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Planview and QualiWare are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Planview is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while QualiWare is ranked #19. Planview holds a 2.9% mindshare in AM, compared to QualiWare’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

8,029 Views
1,927 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

QualiWare X

Read 3 QualiWare X reviews

2,315 Views
995 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

QualiWare X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Planview Portfolios and QualiWare X compete in project and enterprise management solutions. QualiWare X seems to have the upper hand with advanced features, appealing to businesses focused on process efficiency and organizational modeling.

Features: Planview Portfolios offers robust project tracking, extensive portfolio management, and strategic alignment tools. QualiWare X provides comprehensive enterprise architecture modeling, process optimization tools, and a holistic view of organizational processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Portfolios offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer support for quick adaptation. QualiWare X has flexible deployment and emphasizes customer success for tailored solutions, beneficial for companies requiring customization.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios is known for reasonable setup costs and solid ROI through efficient resource allocation. QualiWare X may involve higher initial expenditures but offers significant ROI via process improvements and decision-making enhancements, justified by long-term value in optimizing complex ecosystems.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Portfolios vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios vs. QualiWare X

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,109 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (4th)

QualiWare X

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (49th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 2.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Portfolios	2.9%
QualiWare X	2.2%
Other	94.9%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Gavin Bérubé

Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive

We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material. I like the solution's traceability. The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A lot of of the value is around the project metrics so far but as I get more plugged into the strategic management, it's strategic planning and programs and then tying that into outcomes. I work with executive leadership and that's really what they're looking for, to say, "Okay, what outcomes do we want to achieve and how are we going to get there, plan that out, sequence that out, and then get the work to do that? And then track the work back to where we're headed with our outcomes.""

"Planview Portfolios helped me generate $90 million in annual revenue through better resource allocation and accurate billing."

"As a user, I really liked the ease of the status reporting and the one stop shop of everything being in one location."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is one of the best features. They have very good data warehousing. You can put that out. You can tell that data warehousing from Planview Enterprise One is excellent."

"I have used other PPM tools before, but I found Planview Enterprise to really be the best-in-class for project and portfolio management practices."

"The overall interface is very easy to use. It puts together strategy and execution across all your investments."

"The solution is flexible; Planview is always introducing new releases and functionality, which ends up being beneficial to the company, and we are able to do some customizations on our own along with our IT department, and that's very helpful."

"The most valuable features are the resource management, the time sheet entry and usage, and the financial planning. With our projects, we primarily focus on resource assignments, as far as determining the actual forecast and actuals of our projects. A lot of it is based off of the resources utilized on those projects. The time based helps us capture the actuals. The amount of time people are spending on working on their project tasks. Because they've built this into the schedule, so we can build the forecast. With financial planning, we're able to look back on what our variance is and if there is anything between the scheduled forecasted hours, dollars against the actual hours, and the costs that they utilize."

More Planview Portfolios pros

"It is stable and easy to use."

"Enterprise architecture and a positive sense of understanding soon reached everyone."

"I like the solution's traceability."

Cons

"Being the IT development manager who implements the upgrades for Planview, I would love to see more thorough testing of expenditures and more thorough testing in general. When we do an upgrade, we have to do quite a bit of testing because we can affect the bottom line."

"The number one thing that needs improvement is the UI. It should be easy for a casual project manager. It should provide customizable screens that can be a choice for project managers to choose as a professional level, medium level, and a very easy level."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is very limited. In terms of the out-of-the-box reporting for summary reports, the reporting that we typically leverage is around forecasting for resources, timesheets, and actuals, and just looking at what is the capacity. There is no real summary of what work is being done and how work is being accomplished. So, what we typically do is that we get a copy of the data files from Enterprise One daily, and then we have a team that manages the data mod outside of Enterprise One. They use data from Enterprise One as well as other additional sources to provide the reporting that we share with the management. So, we leverage a lot of Enterprise One data for reporting, but we don't use the reporting capabilities within Enterprise One. So, reporting can be improved, and they could help us make more customized reporting. I know it is very configurable out of the box, but we have to leverage an outside data mod that pulls in a lot of data from Enterprise One. So, the reporting function, and being able to customize reports, is the area that could be very beneficial."

"It is not an end-user-friendly product, and that's really the biggest thing. The hardest or the biggest hurdle I've ever had to face was adoption. I did the installation of the HP product in 2011. The company used it from 2011 to 2015, and the adoption was very high. When I was given the Planview product, adoption was very low. It wasn't as extensively used. We actually had people who wanted to go back to HP PPM because the interface of Planview was so broken, and it still is to some degree. So, it is not user-friendly. It doesn't flow the way a project manager thinks. What we did with HP PPM was a lot more manual programming. It wasn't as nice in terms of the interface, and it wasn't as pretty, but you could design it and build it so that everything flows with the way you worked, but Planview doesn't quite do that. There are a lot of screens. You have to jump back and forth. There are so many different places you have to go to just to do some basic tasks. That's the biggest thing that has really hindered adoption."

"There's still a lot of reluctance within the organization. We're not using all of the capabilities that we have today. We're still doing our strategic and capital investment planning on spreadsheets rather than using the capabilities that exist within Enterprise One. I definitely need to leverage the experts here at Planview to help drive a culture change. There's just a lot of reluctance on behalf of people within the company to put data into the tool."

"The administrative tabs are very confusing, especially in terms of configuring screens and users. It's not very intuitive versus many other applications that I have worked in the past. I have to go to separate sections than I think I have to in order to get to the place that I need to adjust something."

"User information and resource information in Planview Portfolios are separate."

"One of the reasons why we've upgraded so many times is because of performance standards. We've just run into issues where we've had performance problems. Maybe they are not upgrading, but they're adding more horsepower. Then, we do go upgrade and lose that horsepower, which is frustrating from my perspective as an admin to lose that horsepower. Hopefully, that'll change."

More Planview Portfolios cons

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

"In the previous version, the web interface was unstable."

"I was not so satisfied with arrows in this program."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."

"We recently did a new bundle for all of Enterprise One. It includes some of the newer pieces, like Projectplace and LeanKit. It bundled our CTM in with it as well. I think the total came out to be about $900,000 a year. This is for unlimited licenses."

"In the time that I've used it, we've doubled up the amount of dollars on our intended projects."

"We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have."

"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

"When we went through that process, I believe it is competitive with others on the market. However, there are less expensive options available. It's a more premium offering at a higher price."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

17%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 4% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X

Compared 8% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs QualiWare X

Compared 7% of the time

ARIS BPA vs QualiWare X

Compared 7% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs QualiWare X

Compared 6% of the time

iServer vs QualiWare X

Compared 3% of the time

More QualiWare X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

September 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

September 2026

Download QualiWare X product report

Also Known As

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

No data available

Overview

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

QualiWare X is a comprehensive enterprise architecture management tool that assists organizations in improving alignment between business processes and IT infrastructure, enabling efficient decision-making and strategic planning.

Designed for enterprises seeking streamlined operations, QualiWare X provides robust modeling and analysis capabilities. Its architecture management facilitates real-time collaboration, ensuring stakeholders have access to vital information for effective planning. The adaptability of its platform allows organizations to optimize processes and resources effectively.

What are the most valuable features of QualiWare X?

Enterprise Architecture Modeling: Facilitates strategic alignment of business processes with IT architecture.
Collaboration Tools: Enables stakeholders to collaborate efficiently in real-time.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for different organizational roles.
Risk Management: Identifies potential risks and mitigates them proactively.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to standards and regulations.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Improves strategic planning and efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources, reducing operational expenses.
Agility and Flexibility: Supports rapid adaptation to business changes.
Improved Communication: Streamlines stakeholder engagement and understanding.

In specific industries like finance, QualiWare X can streamline compliance processes, while in manufacturing, it optimizes production workflows and resource allocation, enabling these sectors to enhance their operational effectiveness.

QualiWare

Sample Customers

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios vs. QualiWare X

September 2026

Free Report: Planview Portfolios vs. QualiWare X

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Portfolios vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Portfolios vs. QualiWare X report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.