Picus Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

The compared Picus Security and SentinelOne solutions aren't in the same category. Picus Security is ranked #3 in BAS , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 17.2% mindshare in the category. SentinelOne is ranked #3 in CNAP , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Picus Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Picus Security

Read 6 Picus Security reviews

2,299 Views
2,092 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Read 116 SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security reviews

10,287 Views
5,349 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Picus Security

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Picus Security and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).

To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Picus Security

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (3rd)

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (2nd), Container Security (3rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (3rd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (3rd), Compliance Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

Picus Security and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Picus Security is designed for Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and holds a mindshare of 17.2%, down 18.6% compared to last year.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP), holds 4.6% mindshare, up 2.1% since last year.

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Picus Security	17.2%
Pentera	28.5%
Cymulate	20.0%
Other	34.3%

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security	4.6%
Wiz	23.4%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	14.5%
Other	57.5%

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

Featured Reviews

AkashDeshpandey

Cyber Security Consultant at GBS IT Services

Simulate attacks to test and validate security controls effectively

I can simulate an attack into a live environment and test whether my controls are working properly. It checks if the controls can stop and mitigate the attacks One valuable feature of Picus Security is security control validation. It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions. I…

Read full review

Ritesh P.

Senior Manager at ICICI Lombard

It's more scalable and flexible than our previous solution because we don't need to install any agents

The reporting works well, but sometimes the severity classifications are inaccurate. Sometimes, it flags an issue as high-impact, but it should be a lower severity. For example, it might highlight an exposed AWS encryption key, a critical compliance issue, but it isn't tagged as a high-risk problem. That only happens about 10 percent of the time. It shows a true positive 80-90 percent of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."

"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."

"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."

"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."

"It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions."

"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our security posture."

"The most valuable features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are the asset inventory and issue indexing."

"I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security a nine out of ten."

"We like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."

"Our organization is growing steadily, so our infrastructure is expanding, and we're managing more technical resources. Singularity Cloud Security helps us track our resources so that we don't get lost in the overwhelming volume of things and ensures we follow best practices. The solution gives us better visibility into our resources and enables faster resolution."

"Singularity Cloud Security offers autonomous response capabilities, automatically remediating threats and restoring affected files without manual intervention."

"The cloud misconfiguration feature and Offensive Security Engine, as well as their alerting process, are valuable."

"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

Cons

"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."

"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."

"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."

"There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support."

"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."

"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."

"The recommended actions aren't always specific, so it might suggest recommendations that don't apply to the particular infrastructure code I'm reviewing."

"We repeatedly get alerts on the tool dashboard that we've already solved on our end, but they still appear. That is somewhat irritating."

"The dashboard can be more detailed."

"The SentinelOne customer support needs improvement, as they are sometimes late in responding, which is critical in a production issue."

"While SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers robust protection, its cost could be a barrier for some users."

"There is scope for more application security posture management features. Additionally, the runtime protection needs attention."

"In addition to our telecom and Slack channels, it would be helpful to receive Cloud Native Security security notifications in Microsoft Teams."

"In version 2, a lot of rules have been deployed for Kubernetes security and CDR, which makes a lot of issues of critical severity, whereas they are not critical or of high severity. There is a mismatch of severities."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."

"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."

"I am personally not taking care of the pricing part, but when we moved from CrowdStrike to PingSafe, there were some savings. The price of CrowdStrike was quite high. Compared to that, the price of PingSafe was low. PingSafe is charging based on the subscription model. If I want to add an AWS subscription, I need to pay more. It should not be based on subscription. It should be based on the number of servers that I am scanning."

"It is not that expensive. There are some tools that are double the cost of PingSafe. It is good on the pricing side."

"It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."

"It's not cheap, but it is worth the price."

"It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market."

"SentinelOne is relatively cheap. If ten is the most expensive, I would rate it a seven."

"I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."

"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	55

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Picus Security?

The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Picus Security?

The pricing of Picus Security is average, and it offers a good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Picus Security?

There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support. Picus Security could improve the response time.

See all answers

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

I think the pricing of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

One area that could be improved in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is their policies; the way they have configured the policies could be enhanced. There could be a better way to configure cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentera vs Picus Security

Compared 31% of the time

Cymulate vs Picus Security

Compared 30% of the time

SafeBreach vs Picus Security

Compared 12% of the time

AttackIQ vs Picus Security

Compared 11% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Picus Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Picus Security Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 12% of the time

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 11% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Picus Security

October 2025

Download Picus Security product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

September 2025

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

PingSafe

Overview

Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

Picus Security

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.

Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.

What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?

Ease of Use: Intuitive operation simplifies navigation across platforms.
Real-Time Detection: Quick identification and response to threats.
Automated Remediation: Streamlines recovery processes with integration capabilities.
Forensic Visibility: Aids in thorough threat analysis and prevention strategies.
Comprehensive Console: Offers full visibility and historical data tracking.
Platform Integration: Supports seamless operation across cloud and hybrid environments.

What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and third-party integration improve threat response.
Improved Detection: Reduces mean time to detect and respond to threats.
Operational Support: Comprehensive visibility and forensic tools aid operational decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Affordable integration with scaling capabilities without high overhead.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.