Pandora FMS vs Statseeker comparison

Pandora FMS and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Pandora FMS is ranked #78, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Pandora FMS holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pandora FMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

1,793 Views
914 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

900 Views
855 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Pandora FMS are competitive network monitoring solutions. Statseeker shows strength in pricing and support, while Pandora FMS offers more features, providing value for specific needs.

Features: Statseeker offers real-time data monitoring, enabling quick response times and efficient network performance insights. Statseeker consists of easy installation and a user-friendly interface, simplifying network management tasks. Pandora FMS provides multiplatform compatibility and customizable alerts, catering to diverse environments. Pandora FMS also features extended reporting capabilities and flexible scalability, accommodating complex requirements.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker requires enhanced scalability to better serve larger environments and needs more advanced alerting customization. It could also improve its user interface for greater adaptability. Pandora FMS can benefit from a more streamlined deployment process to reduce setup complexity and could offer more competitive pricing options for small businesses. A more intuitive dashboard could enhance its user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is known for its straightforward setup and quick deployment, supported by responsive customer service. Pandora FMS involves a more intricate deployment process with robust customization features, backed by a dedicated service team for addressing setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is recognized for competitive pricing and favorable ROI through efficient resource utilization. Pandora FMS may have higher initial setup costs, but its extensive feature set can justify the expense, offering long-term value for businesses requiring complex monitoring capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Pandora FMS vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (25th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Log Management (63rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (45th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Statseeker	0.4%
Pandora FMS	0.6%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

"The network monitoring and configuration within this solution is very good."

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

"The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

More Pandora FMS pros

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS."

"Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything."

"Third-party integration should be improved for some commonly used products."

"It would be helpful to include the generation of reports for times that the network was out of service."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

More Pandora FMS cons

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Government

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 12% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Pandora FMS

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 29% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 19% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

January 2026

Download Pandora FMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

January 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Free Report: Pandora FMS vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Pandora FMS vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pandora FMS vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.