We performed a comparison between PagerDuty Operations Cloud and xMatters based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The initial setup is a simple process."
"Alert deduplication and noise reduction for alerts are the major features that I found useful."
"The inbound integrations that PagerDuty provides with most of the DevOps tools are valuable."
"It has scaled well for us."
"The most valuable feature of PagerDuty is its integration with other tools, such as Amazon AWS, to receive notifications or create automatic instances."
"The product has valuable on-call scheduling, escalation, and incident workflow management features."
"The product easily integrates with other solutions."
"The most valuable feature is the phone app that allows us to send notifications without the additional fees when sending by SMS or phone calls."
"The ability to have the rota and then configure notifications that you can directly fire them into the group is most valuable. The India shift is from 2:00 AM to 9:00 AM, and then it is the UK shift from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM UK time, and then there is also a defined US shift and on-call hours. It allows us to make sure that everyone is going to get notified when they need to be about an issue. We can target specific locations or users with notifications."
"Workflows and messaging are most valuable. Workflows are very useful. They are important for consolidating information or stopping duplication from happening. We put all the information into xMatters and then the workflow will push the same information in the correct format directly through to other applications that our end users frequently use, such as Slack, email, and Workplace."
"Having our users manage their own notification devices within xMatters is huge, since it takes the burden off our datacenter."
"Probably the most important one is that it persists in attempting to contact to someone until someone is engaged on the event."
"The UI: It is easily navigable."
"The most valuable feature is getting alerts out to my user base. xMatters is the only solution that I know that has robust scheduling, calendaring for groups, and that provides very good delineation of who gets alerted and on which devices they receive their alerts."
"Made it very easy to implement our roster of people who receive alarms with the REST API."
"Allows us to define scenarios that notify only the necessary people when we need to open a conference bridge."
"PagerDuty could improve the event orchestration by enhancing features, such as easier condition setup inside the orchestration."
"It’s quite hard to reach the support team."
"This solution works best in conjunction with a proper logging system, which can be an additional cost to organizations."
"The biggest area for improvement with PagerDuty is noise suppression. There have been a handful of incidents through our use of PagerDuty over the years where one incident may lead to 30 to 50 pages because you're monitoring all these different things, and each thing is an individual page. There should be the ability to set up paging tiers and group correlations between some of the different pages. That is something that would be really valuable. We should be able to say this one page may have a group or a tree of effective other pages that may tier off of it. So, if you see those pages independently, go ahead and alarm, but if you see this plus that, don't do that."
"The solution does not code all alerts correctly so sometimes you get false positives or multiple alerts for the same issue."
"PagerDuty can improve the integration with Terraform."
"It is a very non-customizable product, so you cannot add things like root cause analysis or the classification of incidents based on the area where you are getting more incidents. For example, if you're getting a lot of database issues, that may be an are you want to probe."
"They could include incident merging and alert grouping features in the product."
"The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes."
"I've asked for the ability to have tags on groups, and for dynamic lists, meaning the ability to pull data from another location and use it in xMatters dynamically. Right now, for example, if I have a form and want to populate a list, it's a manual process. I have to copy and paste the list items."
"On-call management scheduling is difficult."
"While they do have an extensive library of integrations, sometimes those integrations or custom integrations, require a more technical level of expertise in products outside of xMatters, such as Java."
"If you are not one of the big players of their customers, the chance that one of your minor wishes will granted are very small."
"An additional knowledge-sharing program could be helpful and part of the demo workshops (right now, these only provide partial information)."
"One of the main reasons why we don't use xMatters for monitoring and alerting is that it doesn't use the rota to call the person who's on-call. It doesn't look up the rota to find out who's on-call and then contacts that person directly. I am not sure if this has changed now, but the last time we checked, this functionality wasn't there. This is one of the main improvements. We're happy with the rest of it."
"They recently released an incident module that allows users, or at least teams, to track major incidents and other things, and you can send out communication via that one webpage. You can engage on-call teams and communicate to stakeholders as well, but one thing that is missing there is a group chat. If there is a group chat on the same webpage that all of the support teams could use, it would be a one-stop shop that all of the major incident managers would use as their product to manage a major incident. Without that, at the moment, they are mainly referring to teams and then adding data into xMatters as and when they can."
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is ranked 1st in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 35 reviews while xMatters is ranked 3rd in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 31 reviews. PagerDuty Operations Cloud is rated 8.8, while xMatters is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of PagerDuty Operations Cloud writes "Effectively generates alerts for incidents, making it suitable for 24/7 monitoring of infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of xMatters writes "Enabled us to meet our "lights out" goal and repurpose staff to do work of greater value". PagerDuty Operations Cloud is most compared with Opsgenie, ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Splunk On-Call and BigPanda, whereas xMatters is most compared with Opsgenie, ServiceNow, Everbridge IT Alerting, OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and Splunk On-Call. See our PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs. xMatters report.
See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
