We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and WordPress based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."Integration within the solution is very good."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"WordPress offers great flexibility."
"I like how it integrates graphics and words, and more generally, the way people can develop the choices of spaces for different websites."
"The best feature in WordPress is Elementor. It lets you easily create one-page landing sites."
"There are so many free plugins"
"The standout feature is its high degree of customization. Creating user-friendly, easily maintainable websites is a breeze, especially with the convenient admin access."
"I like the tool's plugins."
"Ready-made themes speed the design process; a huge number of quality themes are available from several sources."
"The product provides capabilities to build modern websites and can be used for various aspects of services."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"Its functions need more stability."
"WordPress sites do require quite a bit of maintenance: Constant updates to both WordPress and all the various plugins that it requires."
"WordPress could use improvement in terms of optimization, especially for large websites with extensive databases and many images."
"A user may feel intimidated the first time he or she sees it."
"I think that WordPress is too cool in its contact."
"Backups and moving sites could be handled better."
"WordPress needs to improve its usability."
"The basic product is becoming less usable by end users for site maintenance post delivery."
"I would recommend dumping the Gutenberg interface, as that is horrible."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 7th in Web Content Management with 12 reviews while WordPress is ranked 2nd in Web Content Management with 28 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while WordPress is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WordPress writes "Very customizable, and forms the base for most websites on the Internet". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and IBM FileNet, whereas WordPress is most compared with SharePoint, Quintype, Adobe Experience Manager, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and SDL Tridion DX.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
