Oracle VM vs RHEV comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Oracle is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while Red Hat is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Oracle holds a 7.3% mindshare in SVS, compared to Red Hat’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Oracle VM

Read 83 Oracle VM reviews

10,405 Views
7,856 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

RHEV

Read 35 RHEV reviews

4,696 Views
3,623 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Oracle VM

RHEV

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Oracle VM and RHEV compete in the virtualization market. Oracle VM may have an edge in cost savings for Oracle environments, while RHEV offers strong performance and open-source benefits.

Features: Oracle VM provides powerful virtualization specifically beneficial for Oracle database licensing, with hard partitioning and Oracle templates for quick deployments. It supports various operating systems and offers secure live migrations. RHEV uses KVM technology to deliver excellent performance and security features, including Transparent Huge Pages and SELinux. It is open-source, supports live migration, and high availability, catering to a range of applications.

Room for Improvement: Oracle VM could benefit from enhancements in automatic backup, snapshot features, and third-party tool integration. It also needs more flexible network storage management. RHEV can improve its load balancing and clustering capabilities, along with better GUI and live-patching support without reboots.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle VM effectively supports private, hybrid, and Oracle cloud environments, though customer service varies in technical expertise. RHEV also supports diverse deployment environments, but user support can be inconsistent regarding complex queries and third-party integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle VM is cost-efficient for Oracle hardware users, offering free deployment and support with reduced Oracle licensing costs through hard partitions. RHEV is budget-friendly as an open-source solution but requires a subscription for support. Its lower cost compared to competitors is significant, though there is room for further reduction to enhance appeal.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle VM vs. RHEV Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM vs. RHEV

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle VM

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RHEV

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Oracle VM is 7.3%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 3.7%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Rasika Sudasinghe

Senior Director - Systems Architecture at MIT ESP

A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads

Oracle VM is an obsolete product in that no new features are coming for it. The new version is called Oracle KVM. The only improvement needed for Oracle VM is the look and feel of the interface. When comparing the user console with vCenter, the interface used to control VMware environments, Oracle VM's user interface is not that rich in terms of user experience. If Oracle could improve that, it would be good. Besides that, we don't know if the solution comes with a roadmap because it comes free of charge with Oracle x86. We can't expect something similar to vCenter in KVM, but at least if you can improve what users can experience, then it would be good.

Read full review

Sujeet-Kumar

Project Manager Cloud Infrastructure at Path Infotech ltd

The solution is scalable and affordable, but it lacks features, and it is not easy to manage

Management of RHEV is not as easy as VMware. Some features do not work. The product does not provide features similar to VMware’s VMotion. After creating the cluster, the VM is moved to another node if we move down. However, the VM does not move the parent node automatically. It has to be moved manually. VMware moves it automatically. RHEV moves it to the parent node only if we restart. Everything can be handled in VMware through the GUI. However, in RHEV, some things can be managed through UI, and others cannot. We have to troubleshoot and use CLI. A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides enhancements for network and storage configuration, policy-based management for delivering application resource flexibility, and a GUI."

"The solution is easy to use. You can spin one up when you need to and then shut it down."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It is highly esteemed for its ability to efficiently optimize and enhance the operational speed and responsiveness of virtualized environments."

"The support staff in the tech support team at Oracle has improved. I find them extremely helpful and they give very solid support."

"Based on all the testing I have done, I found there were no issues with its performance."

"The product's initial setup phase was simple."

"Ability to patch with no downtime."

More Oracle VM pros

"The platform is scalable, allowing for the installation of multiple nodes."

"The price is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's much cheaper than, for example, VMware."

"The biggest aspect for me is the disk usage, the virtual manager, and the deployment of machines."

"It is a scalable solution."

"What they provide is way beyond the essential requirements of customers."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution has a good licensing module."

More RHEV pros

Cons

"The only improvement needed for Oracle VM is the look and feel of the interface."

"If there are issues with the storage, then all the machines go down, even if I have a backup solution in place."

"I would like to be able to ship all of our logs. This feature could exist and I am just not aware of it."

"Oracle VM should have centralized storage, without which you can't clone or move one VM to another."

"Oracle VM should be more feature-rich."

"We do have a little trepidation with systemd, as it does have a learning curve."

"The performance could be better because I need to purchase a lot of CPUs to perform in the workbench."

"I would say third-party plugins to other storage vendors. There are a lot of converged infrastructure setups; one that we have, multiple different hardware vendors. So that would be something we could definitely be looking for."

More Oracle VM cons

"This solution could be more secure."

"The availability of technical expertise with the solution may be limited in some areas."

"I would love to see better documentation and ease of use."

"While everything needs improvement in some way, I have no specifics."

"A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware."

"The UI should be more interactive with additional features."

"Red Hat by itself is not scalable. But you can have third party add-ons like Ceph to make it massively scalable."

"Customers are not aware of this solution, they can improve by providing more awareness and solution availability."

More RHEV cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the license is expensive."

"The pricing for the platform is aligned with other enterprise virtualization solutions."

"The price of this product is high."

"Licensing costs are less for Oracle Linux and for clients moving to the Oracle Cloud, as it is included in the price of the subscription."

"If you buy an Oracle server, this solution is free. You have to only pay for support."

"Oracle VM is not expensive. I rate its pricing a three out of ten."

"There is no need to make any payments to use the solution. You can just download the product and use it for free."

"The solution comes for free with Oracle's x86 servers, called X9."

More Oracle VM pricing and cost advice

"RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."

"This product has a variety of licensing options available. However, the level of licensing, and therefore the cost of licensing, is dependent on the number of servers being utilized."

"I would say the price is acceptable."

"We are using the free version of Red Hat."

"It's a budget product as far as I'm concerned. It's way cheaper than any of its competitors. The only thing cheaper than Red Hat is that the people who take the Red Hat code clone it and then self-support it."

"The solution does not require licencing but a subscription is necessary, which is very affordable."

"This is an open-source solution."

"The price of RHEV is high. It is an open-source solution, the price should be less. The price should not be on par with a solution, such as VMware. It's not more or equal to VMware, it's less, but the difference should be more substantial."

More RHEV pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)

CIO at Robusta Technology & Training

Jan 13, 2015

vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer

We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

25%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Oracle VM or KVM?

I would prefer if KVM was easier to scale and not so limited. Overall the product has been helpful. It is easy to use, and was quite straight-forward to set up. Since I have been using KVM, I have ...

See all answers

Which is better - Oracle VM or VMware VSphere?

Oracle VM seems to me to be kind of outdated. Nevertheless, it is fairly straightforward to use and maintain. The solution can just be set and you can forget about it, and the scalability is consid...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle VM?

If you want to access the VM from anywhere over the Internet, you put it in a public subnet. So, VMs are linked to that. The subnets are linked to it. So, it's perfectly secured if it's a private n...

See all answers

What do you like most about RHEV?

The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?

It's the open source. There's not much cost. It's very minimal comparably. Compared to what I am paying for VMware, it's negligible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RHEV?

My teammates and I often complain that VMware is well-documented and has a large community since it is the de facto standard. I would love to see better documentation and ease of use. For newcomers...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware vSphere vs Oracle VM

Compared 34% of the time

KVM vs Oracle VM

Compared 19% of the time

Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Oracle VM

Compared 14% of the time

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Oracle VM

Compared 2% of the time

More Oracle VM Competitors

VMware vSphere vs RHEV

Compared 49% of the time

Proxmox VE vs RHEV

Compared 21% of the time

Hyper-V vs RHEV

Compared 10% of the time

KVM vs RHEV

Compared 9% of the time

More RHEV Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM

May 2025

Download Oracle VM product report

Buyer's Guide

RHEV

May 2025

Download RHEV product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization

Overview

Oracle VM for x86

Oracle VM for x86 is a Xen based server virtualization platform for public and private cloud and traditional on premise deployment. Oracle VM offers full lifecycle and application deployment from disk to cloud.

Designed and optimized for security, efficiency and performance Oracle VM supports major hardware vendors x86 and storage platforms and can run workloads on Linux, Windows and Oracle Solaris. Uniquely for our virtualization platform it offers live patching via Ksplice enhancing security and minimizing service disruption. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

Oracle VM for SPARC

Oracle VM for SPARC is a firmware based virtualization platform for Oracle and Fujitsu SPARC based servers running Solaris. Oracle VM supports hard partitioning which can significantly reduce software applications licensing costs.

Oracle

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.

Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Ambulance Victoria, Australian Finance Group (AFG), Avnet Technology Solutions, CERN, cloudKleyer, Danish Tax Authority (SKAT), Data Intensity, Dubai World, Engineers Australia, Enkitec, Groupe FLO, Guerra S.A. Implemento, s Rodovišrios, Interactive One, IT Convergence, Jesta Digital, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, KT, Kyoto Prefecture, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory / National Ignition Facility, Multinet Pakistan, National Australia Bank (NAB), Navis LLC, Overhead Door, Overstock.com, Paragon Data, Parks Victoria, Pella, Sunway Shared Services, St. Louis Metro, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., University of Massachusetts, Versace,

Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM vs. RHEV

June 2025

Free Report: Oracle VM vs. RHEV

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle VM vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle VM vs. RHEV report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.