We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SSIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"I have found its most valuable features to be its package management capabilities and the flexibility it offers in designing workflows."
"The simplicity of the solution is great. The solution also offers excellent integration."
"The most valuable thing is that it is easy to connect with Microsoft tools. In Europe, particularly in France, a lot of companies use Excel, SQL Server, and other Microsoft tools, and it is easier to connect SSIS with Microsoft tools than other products."
"It's saved time using visualization descriptions."
"It is easy to set up. The deployment is also very quick."
"The initial setup was easy."
"Data Flows are the main component we use. These can range from a simple source to sink ETL, to many source to many sink dataflows."
"The data reader is the most valuable feature."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"The solution is expensive."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"The interface could use improvement, as well as the administrative tools. Jobs fail from time to time for different reasons. It's not a problem with Microsoft, or SSIS itself. The problems are external, but to find the problems and analyze them it takes too much time."
"It should have other programming languages supported as well from a scripting perspective. Currently, only C# and VB.NET are supported, which limits it to .NET. It should have Java support as well."
"I would like to see better integration with Power BI."
"It would be nice if you could run SSIS on other environments besides Windows."
"Microsoft should offer an on-premises support warranty for those using that deployment. They seem to be withdrawing from on-premises options."
"Options for scaling could be improved."
"SSIS can improve by the minimum code requirements in stored procedures and exporting data is difficult. They could make it easier, it should be as easy as it is to import data."
"Video training would be a helpful addition."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while SSIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and AWS AppSync, whereas SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. SSIS report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.