Oracle Hyperion vs Planful comparison

Oracle and Planful are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Oracle is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6, while Planful is ranked #15. Oracle holds a 5.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Planful’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planful users who would recommend it.

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,001 Views
1,981 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Planful

Read 2 Planful reviews

795 Views
676 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Planful

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Planful and Oracle Hyperion are competing enterprise performance management products designed for budgeting, forecasting, and financial planning. While Planful is more cost-effective and known for customer satisfaction, Oracle Hyperion is seen as superior for its extensive features, even with its higher price.

Features: Planful offers streamlined planning tools, emphasizes collaboration, and provides user-friendly data insights. Oracle Hyperion provides powerful analytics, sophisticated reporting, and detailed financial modeling with extensive functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planful is cloud-based, allowing quick deployment and minimal IT needs, with responsive customer service. Oracle Hyperion, often on-premises but also cloud-based, requires more deployment time and IT resources but provides robust support.

Pricing and ROI: Planful is cost-effective with faster setup leading to quicker ROI. Oracle Hyperion involves higher initial costs and setup time, offering substantial long-term ROI for complex financial needs. Differences in pricing align with Planful's rapid returns and Oracle Hyperion's extensive functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Hyperion vs. Planful Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion vs. Planful

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planful

Ranking in Business Performance Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Financial Close Software (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 5.5%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planful is 3.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Hyperion	5.5%
Planful	3.1%
Other	91.4%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

Empower financial planning with user-friendly and robust features

The best features of Oracle Hyperion revolve around their cloud-based technology, which is gradually moving to cloud solutions such as EPMCSG, while Anaplan uses two engines for calculations, the classic engine and the Essbase engine. Anaplan allows for quick module changes, where adjustments in one module reflect throughout the user experience. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion relies on Essbase as a database with calculation scripts and business rules, and it incorporates Smart View technology for Excel connections, providing a familiar interface for users. Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation. However, I have observed that Anaplan has built-in UX pages for report preparation, unlike Oracle Hyperion, which often relies on third-party tools such as Hyperion Financial Reporting and Power BI for reporting.

Read full review

reviewer1110591

Financial Planning & Analysis - Finance Manager at a engineering company with 501-1,000 employees

It has helped us speed up the turnaround time on our consolidation, and we haven't had anything come up that the program has not been able to solve

The part that we liked about Excel is that it had a better interface in terms of just graphical illustration of our results. So, if we wanted to look at our financial trends and put it into some type of graphical interface for people to look at, we still have to leverage Excel for that. The dashboards aren't as usable as maybe some of the other solutions, such as Tableau or other BI tools. The application that we use today for our BI tools is Tableau. That's how people absorb information. We don't really use the functionality or dashboards within Planful because of the robustness of Tableau. That's our single source of data. If Planful was better or more comparable in terms of features and functionality, we could probably leverage that in Planful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use. It is very intuitive. Even though there is a lot of functionality that comes out of the box, you can customize the solutions to meet your needs. You have the ability to have business rules that produce all kinds of calculations. We're international, and we do all our FX conversions through that."

"The accuracy of data gathering and consolidation is very good."

"It's basically the same as the other budgeting solutions."

"We can integrate with any system and pull data from SAP or SQL Server. We can also design our own role files to establish how we pull the file data and store it in our database."

"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."

"The implementation has been simplified now that it's deployed in the cloud. Also, Hyperion is tightly integrated with Oracle products because Oracle owns it now."

"The feature that allows automation of the budgeting and forecasting process is extremely valuable, especially when compared to Excel."

"Since it is an enterprise-capable solution, people are not worried about security, giving data, the ability to manage complex consolidation, and its ability to modify reporting."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

"It has helped us speed up the turnaround time on our consolidation. We don't have to do reporting in Excel anymore, which has cut down on the errors and the efficiency of our close time."

Cons

"Sometimes Oracle Hyperion is slow when there are a lot of users using it. However, we can have up to approximately 300 users using it."

"From a technical perspective, the technical support could be improved and the price could be reduced."

"The most important aspect for improvement is the time efficiency when handling large databases."

"The pricing model could be more flexible as it's more expensive than its competitors."

"What I like is to have everything on one platform and not in different modules like Oracle Hyperion."

"The reporting feature in Oracle Hyperion isn't the best. It needs improvement."

"The analytics could be improved."

"This solution's stability is a little problematic."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

"The part that we liked about Excel is that it had a better interface in terms of just graphical illustration of our results. So, if we wanted to look at our financial trends and put it into some type of graphical interface for people to look at, we still have to leverage Excel for that. The dashboards aren't as usable as maybe some of the other solutions, such as Tableau or other BI tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"The solution is affordable."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

"Right now, everything is on a three-year term contract, and that is our main cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Adaptive Insights vs Planful

Compared 18% of the time

Anaplan vs Planful

Compared 15% of the time

Pigment vs Planful

Compared 15% of the time

Jedox vs Planful

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs Planful

Compared 9% of the time

More Planful Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

December 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

December 2025

Download Planful product report

Also Known As

Hyperion

Host Analytics

Overview

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

You need a financial planning solution that meets the structured demands of standardized financial planning and reporting requirements and regulations. Structured Planning with Planful automates labor-intensive planning activities in a complete cloud-based platform – giving your finance team control, consistency, and confidence in corporate financial plans.

Planful

Sample Customers

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Tandem Diabetes Care, Reed Exhibitions, SkyGolf, Zep Inc., Thule, Stylesight, Schumacher Group, Parsons Electric, Nextag, Groupon

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion vs. Planful

December 2025

Free Report: Oracle Hyperion vs. Planful

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Hyperion vs. Planful and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Hyperion vs. Planful report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.