No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Content Management vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Content Management
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (9th)
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x70.4%
Oracle Content Management2.3%
Other97.3%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

SK
Principal Data Scientist at Tata Consultancy
Built-in integrations increase efficiency but cluster support requires improvement
On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environment, improvements are ongoing. The fallback and benefit assessment of the product suggest a need for a rating of seven or eight.
RJ
Senior Business Analyst at a construction company with 51-200 employees
Centralized collaboration has transformed intranet projects but search and mobile still need work
Workflow in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has helped my teams by using it for Sharepoint access request forms. The workflow I use involves submission, and when the submission happens, there is an approval of the form. Approval goes to the manager, and once he approves it, it goes to the next phase. For final acceptance, we send it to an end user so he can check mark on it or indicate that the work is done. These are the approval processes we utilize, including out-of-the-box email approval and alerts sent by the system. Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has saved time and improved productivity by enabling cost-saving measures. When using one place for all documents, your team can see everything in the latest mode. All they need to do is click the link to access the same place, and follow-up conversations occur on the same page. It definitely saves a lot of time and energy for teams, allowing them to focus less on email exchanges and more on project tasks. Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by providing very good collaboration capability. It includes a list, calendar, permissions, and everything that works great for everyone. It offers one centralized place, so there is no need to configure or go to multiple places looking for the same information. Once I update information, everybody syncs on the same data. It also enables tracking changes, restoring previous versions, maintaining document history, and sharing team calendars, organizing the same vision with different kinds of access. This feature definitely contributes to good progress in teams, making it very useful for any organization. Best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers include a list and permission capability, team collaboration capability, workflow and approval process capability. All of these capabilities are fantastic, including version control and permission-based access, providing one centralized place where everybody can see everything and update it. If we need to revert back, version control is there, and we can see how much use case it is. It is very efficient for business users. I am a Sharepoint user for a long time, so all of those features are fantastic.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The reliability of the system is significant, creating a lot of trust among our customers."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"There are competitors out there, but there's a lot that Oracle Cloud offers outside of giving you just a basic database or basic infrastructure-as-a-service that add a lot of value to it."
"My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that it serves as a great collaboration tool."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has definitely impacted my organization positively because now we don't have to manually create folder structures in our local desktops."
"The main feature of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is making document management easier because it is very simple to use, I can use the console web to share documents with some users, and it is very fast to edit the document together with other colleagues and share it without sending emails."
"My advice to others looking into using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that if you are looking for a hassle-free implementation, go for it."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 positively impacts my organization overall through time-saving, cost reduction, and improved collaboration, particularly by eliminating delays for approvals when managers are not on-site."
"With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, the collaboration, versioning control, and data accuracy improved, allowing us to finish the project in just one month or two instead of six, signifying a potential saving of four months worth of time and salary for the same project."
"There is definitely an improved turnaround because of using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted our organization by consolidating all company forms and documents into a single repository, creating a great intranet that avoids the issues of scattered file shares and email communications."
 

Cons

"I would like to see faster turnaround for provisioning new services."
"On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments."
"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"The help section and support for Sharepoint was very lacking."
"I have not seen a return on investment for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department."
"Although I'm really happy with the current way Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 works, I think there is still room for some improvement, enhancement, and refinement in its accuracy and reliability of output."
"Regarding improvements for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I found that while it provides flexibility through Sharepoint Designer for creating workflows, there are limitations where I have to write code rather than using the GUI itself."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved, particularly since Windows 2010 on R2 server is no longer supported by Microsoft."
"Regarding potential improvements for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I note that both products, including the server version, are out of support, so ideally, there should be extended long-term support for security fixes."
"Because sometimes I cannot find some documents by searching for words in Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, I don't know why, but it can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Construction Company
45%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Wholesaler/Distributor
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?
On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environ...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?
I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Content Management?
I recommend Oracle Content Management due to its stability, support, and scalability. However, some improvements are needed, especially in AI integration. Overall, I would rate it seven.
What needs improvement with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7?
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved by combining it with some other features, such as the ability to restrict a single file by an administrator. That would be the feature ...
What is your primary use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7?
My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is storing and backing up files from endpoint devices while sharing files securely across users.
What advice do you have for others considering Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7?
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 a nine. I chose nine out of ten for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 because it is good software an...
 

Also Known As

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Content Management vs. Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.