No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Content Management vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

Oracle and Cognosys Inc Hardened Images are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Cognosys Inc Hardened Images is ranked #55. Oracle holds a 2.6% mindshare in ECM, compared to Cognosys Inc Hardened Images’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cognosys Inc Hardened Images users who would recommend it.
Oracle Content Management
Read 4 Oracle Content Management reviews
  • 1,315 Views
  • 1,039 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Read 10 Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 reviews
  • 134 Views
  • 82 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Content Management
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (8th)
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
55th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Content Management2.6%
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x70.3%
Other97.1%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

SK
SanjeevKumar24
Principal Data Scientist at Tata Consultancy
Built-in integrations increase efficiency but cluster support requires improvement
On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environment, improvements are ongoing. The fallback and benefit assessment of the product suggest a need for a rating of seven or eight.
Read full review
Christine Ndanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Christine Ndanu
Project Manager at PwC
Cloud file management has improved collaboration and strengthened security across our teams
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by improving collaboration, especially through remote collaboration due to the use of a mobile application. Security posture in my organization has really improved due to the robust security features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. Furthermore, it can be accessed from anywhere, making collaboration easy. Some of the best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers are in-built Office suite, works just from any browser, cloud-based, no additional app download is required, alerts and notifications are on par, version control to view any changes made, and access control over any file or folder. The mobile application and remote collaboration features helped my team improve collaboration and also increased our security posture after we implemented Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 in all our organization departments.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"There are competitors out there, but there's a lot that Oracle Cloud offers outside of giving you just a basic database or basic infrastructure-as-a-service that add a lot of value to it."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"The reliability of the system is significant, creating a lot of trust among our customers."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization with apparent savings from the top and up front, with cost reduction, productivity increase, and saved time and efforts in terms of the team's collaborations."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has improved our productivity, especially through improved collaboration, from 50 to 65%."
"I have seen a return on investment with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, as it has given our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and provided them the best tool to automate daily tasks, hence saving a lot of time and cost."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by providing savings through automation, giving our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and the best way to automate daily tasks."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is a great tool that has led to faster turnaround times, less back and forth, improved customer service, more transparency into team functions, elimination of steps through processes, and reengineering, thereby saving cost and time."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by reducing the cost of having tangible memory devices since Microsoft Sharepoint provides unlimited cloud storage."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by making processes easier and improving productivity."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by greatly increasing our collaboration, especially between departmental and remote collaboration."
More Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 pros
 

Cons

"I would like to see faster turnaround for provisioning new services."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments."
"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 should work offline and there is no password protection for folders."
"Customization can be difficult when the out-of-box functionality does not work for your needs."
"One way Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved is by merging two or more Sharepoint sites from different companies together if they are working together."
"Occasionally, we would somehow have an issue with one or two users not seeing the latest document, which was a minor annoyance, but after a few minutes, we were able to get back on track due to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved by making the user interface more intuitive and easy to customize."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very easy to use, but it has some drawbacks in that typical user experience is perceived by many users as difficult or clunky."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved as it still needs to integrate some services together such as Planner and Lists so that teams can interact from a single place."
More Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?
On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?
I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Content Management?
I recommend Oracle Content Management due to its stability, support, and scalability. However, some improvements are needed, especially in AI integration. Overall, I would rate it seven.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management Logo
Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management
Compared 23% of the time
SharePoint vs Oracle Content Management Logo
SharePoint vs Oracle Content Management
Compared 15% of the time
Alfresco vs Oracle Content Management Logo
Alfresco vs Oracle Content Management
Compared 10% of the time
Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management Logo
Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management
Compared 7% of the time
Hyland Perceptive Content vs Oracle Content Management Logo
Hyland Perceptive Content vs Oracle Content Management
Compared 6% of the time
More Oracle Content Management Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2026
Oracle Content Management reportDownload Oracle Content Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2026
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 reportDownload Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 product report
 

Also Known As

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Oracle
Information not available
Cognosys Inc Hardened Images
 

Sample Customers

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.