Oracle BPM vs webMethods.io comparison

"It is easy and cheap."

"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."

"It is easy to use in a business processing suite."

"I find the data lineage features most valuable."

"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."

"Currently, we define the tasks, and based on certain decision rules, the tool decides the task priorities and the time frame of the task."

"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."

"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."

"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."

"This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight."

"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."

"The tool supports gRPC."

"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."

"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."

"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."

"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"The solution's licensing cost is very high."

"There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more responsive to technological changes."

"You have to maintain it manually."

"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking."

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"The learning curve is a little steep at first."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"In terms of improvements, maybe on the API monetization side, having users able to create separate consumption plans and throttle all those consumption plans towards the run time could be better."

"Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"The pricing is very expensive."

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"The licensing model is good."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"The product is expensive."