Oracle BPEL vs Temporal comparison

Oracle and Temporal Technologies are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Oracle is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0, while Temporal Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Oracle holds a 0.7% mindshare in PA, compared to Temporal Technologies’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Temporal Technologies users who would recommend it.

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

585 Views
579 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Temporal

Read 18 Temporal reviews

2,056 Views
2,056 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Temporal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle BPEL and Temporal compete in the workflow and integration solutions market. Temporal has an edge due to its scalable workflow execution tailored for cloud-native applications, while Oracle BPEL shines in pricing and enterprise support.

Features: Oracle BPEL offers strong integration capabilities, comprehensive process automation, and a standards-based approach. Temporal is characterized by its event-driven architecture, flexibility, and resilience, crucial for cloud-native ecosystems.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPEL could benefit from enhancing scalability and customization for modern cloud environments. Its user interface might be more intuitive for non-technical users. Improvements in learning resources to accommodate different expertise levels could also help. Temporal might improve by refining support for standard enterprise business workflows and providing more intuitive UI/UX elements. Additionally, growing its resource library to assist with non-developer-use cases could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPEL ensures stability through extensive enterprise support and a clearly defined deployment process. Temporal is designed with a developer-focused approach, leading to straightforward cloud deployment and comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPEL has higher initial costs due to its enterprise capabilities but offers a substantial ROI through process streamlining. Temporal's cost-efficient pricing aligns with scalable usage, ensuring a clear ROI for cloud-native applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPEL vs. Temporal Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPEL vs. Temporal

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Temporal

Ranking in Process Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 7.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Jozef Ivanic

Senior Business Analyst at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees

Support for human tasks despite challenges with protocols and adapters

It depends on your needs. Oracle BPEL is suitable for enterprise-wide systems. However, if you're building something smaller or don't know precisely what you need, it's better to start with something smaller. Oracle is a comprehensive bundle, and buying it exclusively for Oracle BPEL doesn't make sense. I'd rate the solution six out of ten.

Read full review

AbhishekDash

Senior Software Engineer at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Orchestrates infrastructure tasks like deployment, deletion, and management

Temporal focus on developers rather than business users. In contrast to older workflow orchestration engines like Camunda, which are more business-oriented and strongly emphasize UI and workflow authoring, Temporal is geared toward developers. It provides extensive capabilities for building complex workflows. A standout feature of Temporal is its handling of long-running workflows, a significant advantage over many other solutions. Temporal excels in managing distributed transactions and application state durability, especially in microservice environments where transactions might fail due to network issues. Temporal simplifies these challenges by managing retries, fail-safes, and circuit breakers. As a result, developers don't need to implement these features manually; Temporal handles them implicitly, though it also allows for tuning based on specific needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has everything we need."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"What I like best about Temporal is its durable execution, which means you don't need to write many boilerplate code for critical pieces, especially for retries. It also has great observability and a nice dashboard to see issues without digging into logs. The interface for viewing activities is excellent, with good tracing that shows how long activities took and what ran, making it almost perfect for debugging."

"Temporal allows retryability for different workflows whenever they fail. It helps ensure idempotence and that things get done."

"Temporal focus on developers rather than business users."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to retry from an interrupted state."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable thing about Temporal is that we can create multiple and child workflows. We can segregate work as we want, which is good for work organization. It's also easy to maintain. We're trying to generate and fill PDF forms with custom data, including digital signatures. We call AWS and do all activities through Temporal, like calling and saving data in buckets. We do this because we have a lot of load, with multiple users requesting data. We have two types of users: admin and customer. The admin creates forms, and employees or customers fill them out. When admin gets a form, it's stored in Temporal."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to fix things quickly."

"It is very useful for long-running workflows."

More Temporal pros

Cons

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"We previously faced issues with the solution's patch system."

"One area for the product improvement is the learning curve."

"While the tool can be a bit daunting initially, especially if you're not used to async programming models, it's generally a pleasure. There's always room for improvement, though. I've noticed some limitations with the .NET SDK regarding dynamic workflows, but this might have been improved in recent versions. Overall, I think Temporal could be more open about implementing features in a more—.NET-friendly way, especially in how you add workers and clients."

"Temporal doesn't have built-in data storage to store the state of the ongoing execution."

"One area where I think Temporal could improve is its dashboard, particularly in event tracking. Currently, the dashboard doesn't show a time-based view of events, meaning it doesn't display when an event started or went through the retry process. If this feature could be added in a future release, it would significantly enhance monitoring capabilities. Other than that, Temporal's overall performance is quite impressive, and we're confident we can migrate to the Temporal workflow."

"Temporal's debugging is a bit complex."

"One issue is that we don't have enough resources in the community to get answers when we face problems. We once had a cross-cluster persistence issue, which we solved using different keys. I think Temporal is good right now, but I'm part of the community and will let you know if I think of any improvements."

"I don't like the limitations on data flow, particularly the difficulty of passing large amounts of data between different activities."

More Temporal cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is moderately priced."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

"Temporal is a free, open-source tool."

"The savings weren't as big as we initially expected, but they were pretty great from a developer's perspective."

"It is worth the price."

"Temporal is open-source and free to use, which is great. We didn't have to pay for any premium features."

"The tool is open source under the MIT license, so there are no hidden fees. You can freely use everything on their GitHub and Docker images."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Performing Arts

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle BPEL?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?

In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Temporal?

The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Temporal?

The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 38% of the time

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 31% of the time

Control-M vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 17% of the time

Bonita vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 14% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Camunda vs Temporal

Compared 46% of the time

Orkes vs Temporal

Compared 15% of the time

Flowable vs Temporal

Compared 15% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temporal

Compared 5% of the time

Control-M vs Temporal

Compared 5% of the time

More Temporal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

July 2025

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Buyer's Guide

Temporal

July 2025

Download Temporal product report

Also Known As

BPEL Process Manager

No data available

Overview

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

Temporal automates and manages workflows efficiently, offering resilience in distributed systems with features like retry and fault tolerance. Its capabilities in handling complex workflows and integrating with programming languages make it a valuable tool for managing diverse business logic.

Temporal excels in workflow orchestration, automating tasks across multiple platforms, and ensuring durability in asynchronous operations. It supports long-running workflows and simplifies handling distributed transactions, reducing boilerplate code. Temporal is noted for its durable execution and built-in retry policies, enhancing resilience. Despite its complexity and steep learning curve, it is valued for its integration with popular programming languages and relatively easy setup process, though it requires improvements in user-friendly features, documentation, community support, and security.

What are Temporal's key features?

Automation and Efficient Management: Automatically handles workflows without manual intervention.
Resilience and Fault Tolerance: Features built-in retry policies for increased reliability.
Integration: Supports various programming languages, easing development.
Distributed Transactions: Simplifies complex transaction handling with reduced boilerplate code.
Durable Execution: Ensures long-running workflows are reliably managed.

What benefits or ROI should users evaluate?

Scalability and Reliability: Enhances IT environments through robust workflow management.
Ease of Integration: Supports seamless multi-platform automation.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces need for extensive coding, streamlining processes.
Durability and Fault Tolerance: Provides reliable asynchronous operations.

Temporal is implemented in sectors requiring robust workflow orchestration, such as managing data pipelines, API integration, and scheduling tasks. Organizations in a Kubernetes environment leverage it for its scalability and infrastructure management capabilities, securing integrations and enhancing reliability across IT operations.

Temporal Technologies

Sample Customers

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPEL vs. Temporal

July 2025

Free Report: Oracle BPEL vs. Temporal

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPEL vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BPEL vs. Temporal report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.