Oracle BPEL vs SnapLogic comparison

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

179 Views
130 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle BPEL and SnapLogic compete in the integration and automation space. Oracle BPEL is better suited for complex enterprise solutions, while SnapLogic offers agility and ease of use, making it more appealing for quick deployments.

Features: Oracle BPEL offers comprehensive error handling, supports intricate process orchestration, and handles complex workflows effectively. SnapLogic provides seamless cloud integrations, real-time data processing, and a scalable architecture, offering an intuitive interface for rapid application.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPEL could benefit from enhancements in user interface design and simplified setup processes to reduce reliance on specialized IT resources. There is room for improving scalability options. SnapLogic could improve support for more complex workflows, enhance logging features, and expand third-party integration capabilities to compete with robust enterprise solutions like Oracle BPEL.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPEL requires traditional deployment efforts and specialized resources for setup, which can be time-consuming. SnapLogic offers a cloud-based deployment that is quicker and requires less technical oversight. SnapLogic's customer service is responsive, providing prompt support compared to Oracle's more traditional channels.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPEL involves higher upfront costs but offers substantial ROI for complex enterprise environments. SnapLogic offers cost-effective pricing with faster ROI due to its low initial costs and rapid scaling capabilities, appealing to businesses seeking agility.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPEL vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Oracle BPEL vs. SnapLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SnapLogic

Ranking in Process Automation

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (21st), Cloud Data Integration (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Posham Nampelli

Architecture and Consulting at Synaptics Inc

A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes

I'm a consultant. I do architecting, designing, and development. I have used two versions, 1.1 and 2.0. I’m unsure about the prices because I oversee the development and implementation. I'll highly recommend the product depending on an organization’s requirements. As someone who has worked with BPEL for 13 years, I highly recommend the product for an on-premise or hybrid integration. Multiple products or alternate solutions have come into the integration domain. However, the product has been in the industry from SOA 11g to SOA 12c and OIC. Though there are multiple competitors, the product has been here for a long time and has been helping multiple customers improve their business. Overall, I rate the solution a nine or nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The product has everything we need."

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"Overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."

"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."

"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution could improve its API management."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"SnapLogic doesn't provide any on-premises software, so users have only cloud-based software to use."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"I am looking for more scheduling options. When it comes to scheduling, there are different tools in the market."

"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."

"While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

"The product is moderately priced."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"The pricing is okay."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle BPEL?

The product has everything we need.

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 48% of the time

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 35% of the time

Bonita vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 17% of the time

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Process Automation

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

BPEL Process Manager

DataFlow

Overview

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

Sample Customers

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

Oracle BPEL vs. SnapLogic