OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] vs Quintype comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Web Content Management
16th
Views
248
Comparisons
206
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Web Site Management
Learn More
Overview
OpenText Web Site Management gives you the ability to deliver information directly to users, within context, across multiple and multi-lingual channels. OpenText Web Site Management can create a richer, more interactive online experience, crossing the boundaries between websites, mobile devices, intranets, social networks, and Internet channels.

Bold is the CMS that understands your content. Unlike a traditional CMS, Bold separates the presentation of the content from the content itself. This makes it effortless to create, curate and distribute content for modern consumption across different screens and screen-less voice devices. With a content workflow that is modeled after an effective newsroom, Bold makes it easy for authors to tell stories better with built-in support for reusable content cards, story elements, and story types.

All content added on Bold is optimized for distribution across channels such as SEO, Social and Mobile. Third-party integrations include Apple News, Google News, Facebook Instant Articles, AMP, PWA, Push notifications, email marketing, RSS feeds and others.

As a hosted SaaS CMS, Bold manages server management, performance, security and upgrades for its clients so that digital publishers can focus on creating great content for their audience.

Bold offers developers well-documented APIs, starter kits and design consulting services to jumpstart their own front-end development.

Bold offers free onboarding, migration services, 24/7 chat/email support, auto-scaling infrastructure, 95.95% uptime guarantee and regular backups.

Pricing for bold begins at $99/mo.

Sample Customers
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Givaudan, Anglian Water, Schweizerische Mobiliar Versicherungsgesellschaft AG, Karl Franzens Universit_t Graz, Miele, City of Edmonton, The Mosaic Company, Lone Star College System, St. Lucie County, City of Surrey, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), Sloan Valve, Detroit Diesel
BloombergQuint, The Quint, National Herald, Samachara

OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Management while Quintype is ranked 16th in Web Content Management. OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Quintype is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Quintype is most compared with WordPress.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.