OpenText Software Delivery Management vs PractiTest comparison

OpenText and PractiTest are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while PractiTest is ranked #21. OpenText holds a 5.8% mindshare in ALM, compared to PractiTest’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

3,651 Views
3,505 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

439 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

PractiTest and OpenText Software Delivery Management are competing products in test management and software delivery domains. PractiTest has an advantage in pricing and support, while OpenText stands out with robust features, justifying its higher cost as a worthy investment.

Features: PractiTest provides traceability between requirements, tests, and issues, customizable reports and dashboards, and various custom filters that help organize data. OpenText Software Delivery Management features Agile methodologies support, extensive integration with existing tools, and end-to-end traceability in Agile environments.

Room for Improvement: PractiTest could enhance its scalability for larger enterprises, improve user interface intuitiveness, and expand integration with other third-party platforms. OpenText Software Delivery Management can benefit from simplifying configuration complexity, enhancing user-friendly customization options, and providing more detailed initial deployment guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PractiTest offers cloud-based deployment, facilitating seamless and rapid setup with strong support services. OpenText Software Delivery Management provides scalable deployment options, better suited for complex enterprises, though it might require extensive configuration and support to achieve optimal setup.

Pricing and ROI: PractiTest is competitively priced, providing attractive ROI and emphasizing cost-effectiveness. OpenText Software Delivery Management, while higher in cost, is considered a worthy investment due to its comprehensive feature set that supports substantial returns.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PractiTest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (7th)

PractiTest

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 5.8%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The most important feature is the integration among all the different features in just one tool: Agile management system, requirements management system, test management, defects management, automatic test execution. Really, if you're looking at other tools, you will never find all that integrated into just one tool with all the traceability, with all the elements in just one place."

"There are a lot of predefined reports. We can attach additional reports for users, like who worked on what defect and when, as well as what is the status of the release compared to the previous release. It is really endless. All the data is really linked together. Then, if all the data is linked together, there is an option to prepare reports out of it. We are very impressed with its reporting capabilities."

"The key feature is the usability. It is fast to learn and easy to use. It's very intuitive to work with. Most of the important functions are available via a few clicks, compared to other tools where I have to open a sub-menu and then a sub-menu and another sub-menu, and then press a button."

"Octane works well with the Jira portfolio to track the project with two methods: Agile and Waterfall. We can track all the testing in Waterfall or Agile and synchronize it with Agile tools."

"The feature I found most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its ability to integrate with the CI/CD stack."

"The integration points are very good. Octane gives us a window not only into our manual testing, but also our automation testing and our performance testing. We can see all results from all three streams of testing in one place."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"The product's requirements management feature needs enhancement in terms of functionality."

"Also, while there is a Requirements Module in Octane, it is very plain. It's okay to have some requirements described there, but it's not really following the whole BDD approach. I would like to have more features for requirements in there."

"We've only had a few stability issues. Generally, we have issues following any deployment they do, so if they do a deployment on a Sunday, then we may have a couple of issues on a Monday or Tuesday."

"Updating items, sorting, bulk updates—these things could have a bit more flexibility, but it's still possible to do them."

"We have some requests to beef up the manual testing abilities and the ability to report on testing progress. All the basics are there, but there's an issue of maintainability. For example... once you plan a test and it creates a run, more particularly a suite run, you can't edit the suite run afterward... That that is not realistic with how people work. Mistakes are made and people are humans and we change our minds about things. So the tool needs to allow for a bit more flexibility in that testing area, as well as some better widgets to report on progress."

"There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs."

"What could be improved in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its integration with Jira."

"I like their smart analytics; perhaps they should continue to expand and improve there because it's a fantastic start."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight on a scale from one to ten, where ten is very expensive."

"In my opinion, it's good value for the price that you pay."

"I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."

"The price of Micro Focus ALM Octane is too high compared to other solutions."

"It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time."

"The product is highly priced compared to other tools."

"The tool's price is extremely high."

"For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 43% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 27% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 20% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 17% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 12% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs PractiTest

Compared 12% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

August 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

August 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

No data available

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PractiTest

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.