Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Privileged Access Manager vs senhasegura SaaS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Privileged Access ...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
35th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
senhasegura SaaS
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of OpenText Privileged Access Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of senhasegura SaaS is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Has a useful credential vault feature but the user interface needs to be improved
I don't have a complete picture to be able to tell you that this is the best product. Because each customer in their own environment has a different set of circumstances and different situations that mandate different technologies. I cannot recommend this as the best product or recommend that you should use it. I would rate this product a six out of 10.
MB
Easy to deploy and offers a good return on investment
CyberArk is the oldest tool and the most experienced one that can be integrated with a lot of interfaces and platforms, which is a huge advantage. A product like senhasegura is very new on the market and is doing very well while also growing very fast. Again, they are very good at integrating with several platforms. The tool is growing and I see a really good future for the tool. The tool has to improve its interface and make the product more user-friendly. In CyberArk, we need more dashboards to monitor things. In senhasegura, again, we need the personalizable dashboards.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Most valuable feature is the credential vault."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
 

Cons

"The user interface could be improved, it's not that good,"
"The tool has to improve its interface and make the product more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Compared to CyberArk, the tool is very cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for senhasegura SaaS?
Compared to CyberArk, the tool is very cheap. CyberArk is super advanced and the king.
What needs improvement with senhasegura SaaS?
CyberArk is the oldest tool and the most experienced one that can be integrated with a lot of interfaces and platforms, which is a huge advantage. A product like senhasegura is very new on the mark...
What is your primary use case for senhasegura SaaS?
I use the solution in my company as a PAM tool. For privileged access management, there are tools like senhasegura SaaS, BeyondTrust, One Identity, and CyberArk. CyberArk is the greatest tool from ...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Privileged Account Manager
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2025.
860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.