OpenText Output Management vs Ricoh InfoPrint comparison


Categories and Ranking

OpenText Output Management
Ranking in Output Management
Average Rating
Number of Reviews
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ricoh InfoPrint
Ranking in Output Management
Average Rating
Number of Reviews
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Output Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Output Management is 50.0%, up from 31.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ricoh InfoPrint is 50.0%, up from 18.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Output Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found

Featured Reviews

it_user567633 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2016
It's relatively easy to get a hold of resources that understand and know how they work.
For a company like RAK Ceramics, virtualization and cloud is the obvious way to go. The problem is the cost justification for the transition; that's the difficult bit. Some help with that would be good. They spend a huge amount of money running their own data centers. It seems crazy for them to do that. Getting it all out onto the cloud would be a much more sensible way for them to go. Whether they'll go for it or not, I don't know. We're just starting the discussions at the moment. As far as any other areas with room for improvement, it's all the usual stuff: faster, cheaper.
Use Ricoh InfoPrint?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Output Management solutions are best for your needs.
789,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Also Known As

HPE Output Server, HP Output Server, Output Server
No data available

Learn More




Sample Customers

Agilent, Allergan, Columbus McKinnon, HP, Iron Mountain, Moen, Valero