OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	2.0%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	96.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."

"Microsoft programs are usually very easy and straightforward to install."

"The user interface is very friendly."

"One of the best documentation in the world."

"The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable."

"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."

"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."

"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."

"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code."

"I would like to see more integration in the solution."

"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."

"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."

"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."

"The solution should be cheaper."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is expensive."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."

"It is a price-effective solution"

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"The pricing is expensive."

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Visual Studio Test Professional

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?

Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional