OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5, while Microsoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

3,108 Views
2,424 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

4,004 Views
2,402 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are competitors in the software testing industry. While Visual Studio Test Professional is advantageous for its integration capabilities and pricing, OpenText Functional Testing Lab holds the advantage with its advanced features and extensive automation capabilities.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers seamless integration with Microsoft products, efficient automated test case management, and robust reporting. OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides comprehensive testing functionalities, extensive platform support, and specialized automation tools for mobile and web applications.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could enhance its mobile testing capabilities, improve user experience in cloud environments, and expand cross-platform testing features. OpenText Functional Testing Lab could offer more straightforward reporting tools, simplified user on-boarding, and refined integration with third-party platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab utilizes a cloud-based deployment model, offering flexible access and scaling options, supported by excellent customer service for smooth implementation. Visual Studio Test Professional requires on-premise setup but benefits from robust customer support within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional has a competitive pricing structure with lower initial costs, presenting a favorable ROI over time. OpenText Functional Testing Lab, although priced higher, offers significant ROI thanks to its extensive testing functionalities, appealing to businesses that require comprehensive testing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	2.1%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	95.9%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"The pricing is great."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"Using the existing enterprise tools, like UFT, or even if you want to go open source, you can use them and it's a real user-functional performance, we are able to achieve that."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"It is a very common and strong product, and a lot of support is available for this product."

"The setup is easy and straightforward."

"The product is very easy to use and we were able to scale up the automation solution quickly which was beneficial."

"It's great for the development of .NET."

"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."

"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."

"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."

"The solution can improve the startup time."

"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."

"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."

"Its UI could be better."

"The interface should be made attractive."

"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."

"The solution is quite expensive."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."

"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."

"The tool is affordable."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Non Profit

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 3% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

August 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

July 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?

Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

August 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.