OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Qualibrate are competitive products in the automation testing arena, with Qualibrate having the upper hand due to its user-friendly setup and feature richness.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers supports comprehensive test environments and integrations, while Qualibrate offers rapid test process automation, a simplified workflow, and a more streamlined feature set that enhances user efficiency.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could benefit from enhancing its feature set to match competitor offerings, making integrations more intuitive, and simplifying complex workflows. Qualibrate may improve by expanding its support for older systems, enhancing customization options, and refining reporting tools for better analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a flexible deployment model and extensive customer support that aids its setup process. Qualibrate, with its intuitive interface, quick setup, and efficient support services, offers a superior deployment experience, facilitating smoother adoption.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers competitive setup costs focused on consistent ROI through cost-effective strategies. Qualibrate, despite its higher initial cost, provides greater long-term ROI by accelerating testing cycles and reducing maintenance overhead, making the upfront costs justifiable.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
