OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Qualibrate compete in the functional testing automation category. Qualibrate seems to have the upper hand with its innovative approach offering enhanced operational simplicity and appealing to users seeking an all-in-one solution.
Features: OpenText focuses on flexibility and customization with extensive scripting capabilities suitable for complex test scenarios. It offers detailed testing setups, making it robust for diverse projects. Qualibrate offers integrated test documentation, process capture, and synchronization features, ensuring streamlined processes. Its intuitive end-to-end process design is advantageous for reducing complexity.
Room for Improvement: OpenText can improve by simplifying its deployment model and reducing setup time. Enhancing user interface intuitiveness could increase its accessibility for new users. Additional integration with modern development frameworks could expand its appeal. Qualibrate might enhance its feature set for handling more complex testing scenarios. Increasing customization options could attract users with specific requirements. More extensive scripting capabilities might offer better support for complex test environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText presents a traditional deployment model requiring more setup time but offers strong support and detailed guidance. Qualibrate's cloud-based approach allows rapid deployment, minimizing setup efforts. Its customer service is geared towards speed and accessibility, supporting a quick-start philosophy.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText's setup cost is higher, suitable for its extensive features and customization abilities, with returns evident in its robust testing environment. Qualibrate's competitive pricing and fast deployment provide a compelling ROI, especially for businesses prioritizing efficiency and speed over extensive customization.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Qualibrate | 0.4% |
| Other | 96.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
