OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

OpenText and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. OpenText is ranked #45, while Red Hat is ranked #37. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

1,234 Views
1,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

1,841 Views
1,823 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and Red Hat CloudForms are competing products in the cloud management automation space. OpenText Cloud Service Automation has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support. However, Red Hat CloudForms offers a comprehensive feature set that many consider worth the investment.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides efficient orchestration capabilities, scalable resource management, and user-friendly interfaces. Red Hat CloudForms offers extensive automation, hybrid cloud integration, and enhanced security features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Cloud Service Automation could enhance its hybrid cloud capabilities, expand security features, and offer deeper integration options. Red Hat CloudForms may improve with simpler deployment processes, reduced initial costs, and more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Cloud Service Automation offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive support for various business sizes. Red Hat CloudForms, while providing extensive customer service, involves a more complex deployment that requires additional resources but supports complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is notable for lower initial setup costs, potentially offering quicker ROI with simpler pricing models. Red Hat CloudForms, despite higher setup costs, provides features that justify the investment, leading to significant long-term ROI for enterprises leveraging its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

45th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

37th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat CloudForms	1.9%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	1.2%
Other	96.9%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"These products let us integrate multiple tools together and help to automate the processes by cutting down time and effort through the modules and reusable contents."

"Scalability is the most valuable feature to us."

"The ability to tie the pieces together, supporting multiple providers across both HPE and non-HPE products, is crucial in a heterogeneous environment composed of many different commercial and in-house developed components."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

"We really look at infrastructure as a service as the major trend in IT, at least for a service provider like us, for the next 3 to 4 years, so we really want to have a precise, clearly defined, but very dynamic and flexible private cloud where we can easily provision and deploy infrastructure as a service to our end customers."

"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting, as it means we can prepare a bunch of VMs with self-service provisioning."

"The solution is compatible and integrates with various infrastructures or providers."

"They are a very mature product."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

"The stability of the solution is very good, and we haven't had any issues with it."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

"Red Hat CloudForms is stable once it is up and running."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"I’d like to see better monitoring visibility. We have to rely on HPE Technical Services to tell us when those challenges and problems occur."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"I haven't found very user friendly things, some are a little tricky."

"Deployment has been extremely painful for the production environment. This was mostly due to the decision to use our internal Microsoft-based Certificate Authority (CA)."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."

"The solution is still quite immature."

"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed."

"Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware."

"The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved."

"The complexity of the solution is a bit high in comparison to VMware."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	8

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 10% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudify vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Multicloud Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Service Delivery Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Automation Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

June 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

June 2026

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

No data available

Overview

OpenText Cloud Service Automation streamlines cloud management by offering scalability and flexibility, allowing businesses to automate processes and reduce manual intervention. This solution empowers organizations to manage resources efficiently and optimize operations.

By leveraging OpenText Cloud Service Automation, companies can automate deployment, management, and scaling of cloud services. It supports integration with existing workflows and ensures efficient resource utilization. Businesses benefit from simplified IT operations, reduced overhead, and enhanced agility. This solution allows for seamless cloud orchestration and offers support for hybrid environments, helping organizations stay ahead in a competitive market.

What are the most valuable features?

Scalability Management: Automates scaling of resources to meet demands without manual input.
Cost Optimization: Provides insights into cost management, reducing overall expenses.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing tools for seamless workflows.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Offers flexibility in managing both public and private cloud resources.
Resource Automation: Automates provisioning and lifecycle management for better efficiency.

What benefits should be evaluated?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks and automates processes.
Cost Savings: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource management.
Enhanced Agility: Accelerates deployment times and improves time-to-market.
Operational Visibility: Provides detailed insights into resource usage and performance.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail successfully implement OpenText Cloud Service Automation to ensure compliance, enhance customer services, and manage transactions efficiently. The adaptability of the platform supports implementation across diverse business models.

OpenText

Red Hat CloudForms is a robust management platform that integrates seamlessly with open-source technologies like Kubernetes and Docker. It offers flexibility with diverse infrastructures, scalability, and dynamic catalog creation.

Red Hat CloudForms supports service providers in UAE by offering a central console for infrastructure management. Known for its multi-tenancy and streamlined interface, it facilitates seamless integration with infrastructures like Nexus, Solaris, IBM, and VMware. Despite its strengths, challenges such as complexity and user-friendliness have been noted, with users requesting predefined modules, enhanced dashboards, and improved customization. The cost and platform lifecycle remain concerns, especially when compared to competitors like VMware. Permission refinement and provisioning engine improvements are also needed, as well as better cloud service integration and stability.

What features make Red Hat CloudForms stand out?

Seamless Integration: Works well with open-source components like Kubernetes and Docker.
Multi-Tenancy: Allows multiple users with separate environments.
Scalability: Designed to grow with infrastructure needs.
Dynamic Catalog Creation: Offers customized service delivery.
Report Capabilities: Provides in-depth analytics and reporting options.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Flexibility: Supports diverse infrastructures like VMware and IBM.
Self-Service Provisioning: Reduces time to deploy and manage VMs.
Automated Infrastructure: Automates code for more efficient management.
Integration Opportunities: Works with Ansible Tower for application management.

In industries, Red Hat CloudForms serves as a central hub for service providers, managing and orchestrating platforms like NETGEAR, KVM, Hyper-V, and VMware. Automation of infrastructure code, server management, and cloud infrastructure evaluation are core use cases, with users integrating technologies like Ansible Tower for daily task management and access delegation.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.