OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

OpenText and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. OpenText is ranked #36, while Red Hat is ranked #31. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

384 Views
280 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

653 Views
640 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and Red Hat CloudForms are competing products in the cloud management automation space. OpenText Cloud Service Automation has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support. However, Red Hat CloudForms offers a comprehensive feature set that many consider worth the investment.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides efficient orchestration capabilities, scalable resource management, and user-friendly interfaces. Red Hat CloudForms offers extensive automation, hybrid cloud integration, and enhanced security features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Cloud Service Automation could enhance its hybrid cloud capabilities, expand security features, and offer deeper integration options. Red Hat CloudForms may improve with simpler deployment processes, reduced initial costs, and more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Cloud Service Automation offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive support for various business sizes. Red Hat CloudForms, while providing extensive customer service, involves a more complex deployment that requires additional resources but supports complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is notable for lower initial setup costs, potentially offering quicker ROI with simpler pricing models. Red Hat CloudForms, despite higher setup costs, provides features that justify the investment, leading to significant long-term ROI for enterprises leveraging its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

36th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

31st

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at MindTree

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

"I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs."

"The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't had any issues with it."

"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."

"They are a very mature product."

"The solution is compatible and integrates with various infrastructures or providers."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."

"I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions."

"The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

"Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware."

"It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."

"The solution is still quite immature."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

We have large customers for OpenText Cloud Service Automation. I rate it a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 36% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 33% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 31% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

VMware Cloud Director vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 25% of the time

Morpheus vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 24% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 18% of the time

OpenNebula vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 14% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

August 2025

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

August 2025

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

No data available

Overview

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

Manage container, virtual, private, and public cloud infrastructures

Managing a complex, hybrid IT environment can require multiple management tools, redundant policy implementations, and extra staff to handle the operations. Red Hat® CloudForms simplifies IT, providing unified management and operations in a hybrid environment.

As your IT infrastructure progresses from traditional virtualization toward an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model, CloudForms evolves, protecting your investments and providing consistent user experience and functionality.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.