OpenText Business Processing Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

OpenText Business Processing Testing and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked #37, while OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText Business Processing Testing holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText Business Processing Testing users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

1,154 Views
992 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

3,108 Views
2,424 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are in the testing tools category. OpenText Functional Testing Lab has the upper hand due to its superior features across platforms.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing has strong cross-technology diversity, modular testing capability, and the ability for non-technical testers to create automated tests. OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers real device testing, flexible deployment configurations, and comprehensive mobile app testing features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Business Processing Testing can enhance its integration capabilities, scalability, and support for more diverse testing methodologies. OpenText Functional Testing Lab could improve its initial setup ease, reduce complexity in API utilization, and expand real-time support for various environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Business Processing Testing provides a straightforward deployment model with responsive customer support. OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers robust deployment strategies with comprehensive customer support to handle its wider application scope.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing has lower initial costs and faster ROI, suitable for budget-conscious settings. OpenText Functional Testing Lab involves a higher investment but offers long-term ROI through extensive features for in-depth testing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.9%
Other	97.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"The product is easy to use."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

Cons

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support."

"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

18%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Non Profit

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 17% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Testim vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

August 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

August 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.