OpenText Business Processing Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

OpenText Business Processing Testing and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked #37, while OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText Business Processing Testing holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText Business Processing Testing users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

350 Views
284 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,143 Views
800 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web compete in the software testing category. OpenText Functional Testing Lab appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and value for extensive mobile and web testing environments.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers comprehensive test management, automated testing workflows, and simplified testing processes for both technical and non-technical users. OpenText Functional Testing Lab supports cross-platform testing, advanced mobile testing capabilities, and integration with continuous integration systems, providing a wide array of testing functionalities and real device testing.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Business Processing Testing could enhance cross-platform support, improve integration with a broader range of third-party tools, and streamline its update process. OpenText Functional Testing Lab could expand its automation capabilities, offer a wider range of device compatibility, and improve cost-effectiveness for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Business Processing Testing features a straightforward server-based deployment model with strong customer service support. OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers a cloud-based deployment model that enables rapid scalability and flexibility with efficient customer service, making it suitable for dynamic environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing involves a lower initial setup cost, leading to a quicker ROI due to its streamlined deployment. OpenText Functional Testing Lab requires a higher initial investment but offers significant long-term ROI through its extensive feature set and scalability for comprehensive mobile and web testing.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	1.6%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.7%
Other	97.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The product is easy to use."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Non Profit

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Appium vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

January 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

January 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.