OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs WorkflowGen comparison

OpenText and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while WorkflowGen is ranked #39. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to WorkflowGen’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

1,815 Views
1,742 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

2,399 Views
1,080 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and WorkflowGen are competing products in workflow management and collaboration. OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides advantages in pricing and customer support, but WorkflowGen's advanced features make it a compelling choice for those seeking comprehensive solutions.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates with Microsoft SharePoint, offering document management and collaboration capabilities. It supports version control and unified content repository access. WorkflowGen provides advanced workflow automation tools and process optimization features, supporting multi-step approval processes, and has a user-friendly interface for designing workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates smoothly with existing SharePoint environments and delivers reliable customer service. WorkflowGen offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises and cloud, along with responsive service, making it adaptable for different organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint generally has a more affordable setup cost, appealing to those seeking cost-effective SharePoint add-ons. WorkflowGen, though potentially higher in initial costs, promises significant ROI through its efficient process capabilities, which may justify its price for organizations focused on long-term process improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (27th), Process Automation (39th), Rapid Application Development Software (31st), Low-Code Development Platforms (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	1.2%
WorkflowGen	1.0%
Other	97.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance; the solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"It is a good solution; it gives you a lot of flexibility in having a few items for basic knowledge management, it's scalable, and there are a lot of new things that can be added."

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"Took few hours to build workflows with ready-to-use templates, so we had improved productivity."

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

"It’s easier, more controlled and automatized checks of the budget through this system."

Cons

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"To be honest, my experience with OpenText is that usually, they are not doing too much on quality assurance with their product."

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

"Yes, for email notification but it could also be with company network."

"The reports for users. The reports with more details; we have to generate them by the database."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"It has a reasonable price."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Agiloft Workflow and BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Nintex Process Platform vs WorkflowGen

Compared 7% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs WorkflowGen

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs WorkflowGen

Compared 5% of the time

Jitterbit Vinyl vs WorkflowGen

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 4% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

April 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

May 2026

Download WorkflowGen product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

No data available

Overview

OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration and document management by offering seamless integration with Microsoft Teams, strong file compatibility, and customizable workflows, supporting real-time access and automation.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides an efficient platform for document management and workflow automation through features like metadata retrieval and version control. It offers integration with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs, enhancing collaboration across industries. While users face challenges with licensing complexity and Office 365 integration, OpenText 360 plays a critical role in digitalizing documents and managing workflows. Despite its strong capabilities, improvements in pricing flexibility and support services are needed to elevate user experience.

What are the key features of OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Customization: Offers flexible workflows and approval processes.
Integration: Seamless with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs.
File Compatibility: Supports diverse file formats effortlessly.
Collaboration: Real-time document management and access.
Metadata Retrieval: Enhances document indexing and search.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Improved document management and workflow automation.
Security: Robust document retention and audit trail features.
Flexibility: Customizable workflows tailored to business needs.
Scalability: Supports high-volume document processing.
Automation: Simplified invoicing and operations through SAP APIs.

In industries like legal and utilities, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is implemented for its document management capabilities. It integrates with tools like Microsoft Teams to enable efficient workflows and digitalization processes, supporting enterprise document indexing and advanced search functions across sectors.

OpenText

WorkflowGen streamlines process management with a customizable platform, catering to complex business needs through automation and seamless integration. It enhances operational efficiency and supports a wide range of applications.

Designed for professionals, WorkflowGen offers a comprehensive environment for building, deploying, and managing workflows. It integrates with existing enterprise systems, enabling businesses to automate workflows efficiently. With a focus on process improvement, it includes capabilities for analytics and compliance management, ensuring adaptability and scalability. This versatility makes WorkflowGen a strategic tool for enhancing performance.

What are the key features of WorkflowGen?

Web-Based Designer: Offers an intuitive interface to design workflows without needing advanced coding skills.
API Integration: Facilitates seamless connectivity with external systems to extend functionality.
Customizable Forms: Allows users to design forms tailored to business requirements.
Process Monitoring: Provides real-time insights and analytics to track process efficiency.
Mobile Access: Enables access to workflows on the go, ensuring flexibility and productivity.

What benefits should be noted in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Automates manual processes, reducing time and operational costs.
Scalability Potential: Adapts to growing business demands with minimal adjustments.
Compliance Management: Ensures regulatory compliance through robust process tracking.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates collaboration across departments by centralizing workflows.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases productivity by automating repetitive tasks.

WorkflowGen sees application in sectors like finance and healthcare, where workflow automation enhances regulatory compliance and improves service speed. In manufacturing, it optimizes production line management. It adapts to unique industry demands, offering a tailored approach to process enhancement and employee productivity.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.