OP5 Monitor vs vRealize Network Insight comparison

ITRS and VMware are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ITRS is ranked #53, while VMware is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.7. ITRS holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to VMware’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware users who would recommend it.

OP5 Monitor

Read 6 OP5 Monitor reviews

1,005 Views
129 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

vRealize Network Insight

Read 46 vRealize Network Insight reviews

785 Views
117 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OP5 Monitor

vRealize Network Insight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

VRealize Network Insight and OP5 Monitor are competing network management solutions. VRealize Network Insight seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive analytics capabilities, while OP5 Monitor's strength lies in its customization and flexibility.

Features: VRealize Network Insight provides advanced tools for network visualization, analytics offering deep insights into physical and virtual environments. It excels in proactive monitoring and troubleshooting. OP5 Monitor delivers extensive alerting capabilities, praised for its flexibility and scalability, making it ideal for customized network environments.

Room for Improvement: VRealize Network Insight could enhance its customization options to meet varied business needs better. Improved scalability could benefit larger organizations. Integration with third-party tools is another area for development. OP5 Monitor may enhance its user interface for more intuitive use. Reducing setup complexity could help attract users seeking quicker deployment. Offering enhanced analytics would meet the demands of users needing deeper insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VRealize Network Insight offers straightforward deployment with strong support services. It suits organizations seeking smooth implementation with organized assistance. OP5 Monitor, while providing detailed guidance and support, requires more setup complexity due to its adaptable nature, making it suited for businesses prioritizing customization.

Pricing and ROI: VRealize Network Insight comes with premium pricing reflecting its high-end analytical capabilities, offering strong ROI for enterprises leveraging its full features. OP5 Monitor, typically more cost-effective, presents good ROI through cost-efficient customization options. Organizations must balance initial costs against long-term returns, deciding whether comprehensive analytics or cost-efficiency holds more value.

To learn more, read our detailed OP5 Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OP5 Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OP5 Monitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

53rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

vRealize Network Insight

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

38th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vRealize Network Insight is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Harish Venkateshappa

Information Technology Staff at GlobalFoundries

Useful online resources, customizable, and highly effective monitoring

The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users. If there are corrupt files the data can be extracted from them. Anyone who wants to see the performance of memory usage, such as whether it's at 80 to 90 percent, can use this tool. However, other tools can provide this information in two minutes, this tool is more time-consuming and the report it provides is not very effective for practical use. When it comes to reports, the tool falls short. During a recent call, it was noted that while the company has distributed servers across the globe, only the master server can accommodate the reports and events, causing delays. If other servers experience issues, the team cannot view the reporting or tag things, such as for troubleshooting purposes. If this aspect was improved it would be an excellent tool.

Read full review

NiteshKumar1

Principle consultant at Infosys

The tool's configuration is easy and artifacts are easily accessible through professional services and the web

The product is highly regarded, and many customers have been using it along with other VMware products like vSphere and VMware vCloud Usage Insight. However, recently, there's been a trend among customers, especially those using VMware for a considerable period, to explore the potential of migrating to the public cloud. The common concern among these customers is how the VMware products will perform in the public cloud environment. Migrating instances from VMware to different platforms is not easy, especially when dealing with many instances across multiple customers. Customers are keen to maintain the functionality of their existing VMware products but prefer to run them on the public cloud instead of on-premise servers. Our clients for vRealize Network Insight are enterprise businesses. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users. It could be everything from monitoring disk space to CPU usage to memory. It could include determining if the response time in your e-commerce platform is quick enough, or whether you have too many bounces from some of the pages on your website. You want to monitor anything that could cost you money or time or resources. You can do that with this system. It's very flexible."

"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."

"We can also observe whatever we want, and there are no limitations."

"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."

"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."

"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."

"It helps a lot because, until now, we didn't have the tools to figure out the micro level, VM-to-VM kind of traffic; that was not in the current environment. We could not figure out VM-to-VM communication from the other tools. This is the tool which gives us end-to-end transparency."

"The initial was straightforward. You can have it up and running in one hour."

"The most valuable feature is the profiling of the applications for micro-segmentation... It has made the migration to NSX much easier. Most of the sys admins within the smaller silos, they have no idea what ports are needed to run their stuff at all. I am pretty sure the micro-segmentation would never, ever have occurred without it."

"We can see everything going on in NSX and get a good picture of our environment."

"It allows you to see traffic that you couldn't otherwise see, which is traffic within your Layer 3-bounded network, meaning east-west traffic. It's hard to get that any other way."

"The most valuable feature for us is that insight into what our network is really doing - it's a fairly complex network. Not having to go through thousands of lines of network configuration to find firewall ports that were open or closed, for various ports, was very valuable. It went out and found everything we need very quickly."

"The automation collects all the relationships between servers, allowing us to visualize these relationships and organize the migration into waves."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and tracking. It's also intuitive and user-friendly. The screen looks exactly the same as the other appliances for VMware, so it's easy to navigate."

More vRealize Network Insight pros

Cons

"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."

"We do not get performance reports properly."

"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."

"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."

"They need to improve the dashboard interface."

"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."

"The IT infrastructure industry is expected to evolve towards a hybrid cloud model in the next five to ten years. In this model, most of the customer's resources reside on-premise within a private cloud setup, such as VMware. Another segment operates within public cloud environments like Azure and AWS, and a portion remains in traditional data centers. There should be seamless interoperability between public and private clouds. AWS and VMware need to work together to make it possible. Whether users interact with on-premise infrastructure or configure resources in the public cloud, the user experience must be seamless."

"I would like to see them expand the capabilities to infrastructure types other than just VMware."

"If it had some kind of plugins with vSphere, more effective plugins with Horizon View or other VMWare products, if it had interconnectivity, I think it would be more effective than it is today."

"The solution can be improved by making it more compatible with other brands, allowing for better integration."

"When we talk about those micro-segmentation rules, there's an Export function. It is very macro-segmentation oriented instead. So if you choose an application, it will find the tiers within that application and say that it's communicating on, say, port 80 to a separate VLAN. There might be 200 machines in that other VLAN. You don't want to open port 80 at all of them. So we need a lot more granularity in those suggested firewall rules."

"The product is slightly complex use, while still being user-friendly. It could use more training modules, as it is not a straightforward product."

"The virtual appliance has rebooted."

"The only issue we have is that the solution does not always capture the host names."

More vRealize Network Insight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."

"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."

"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."

"We have spent less time investigating network flows, so it is absolutely cost-effective."

"They should include the product in NSX because it's important to have it for deployment."

"It's a little expensive, but for what you're getting out of the product, you often see the trade-off. It depends on the type of licensing you have. It might be a little too pricey for some."

"vRealize Network Insight is expensive."

"The solution has reduced the time that we spend on other products. For example, with NSX, we were able to quickly find things that we would normally spend days trying to figure out."

"It's an expensive product because we have a lot of nodes."

"Cost always has room for improvement, you could always make it cheaper. But I think it's a good value for what you pay for it."

"It reduces costs. It takes something that may be challenging and makes it more usable and visual by being able to bring in tools, seeing what their impact is, such as microsegmentation and application rationalization, and seeing it quickly."

More vRealize Network Insight pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about vRealize Network Insight?

The tool's ease of configuration and use and the availability of information and artifacts through professional services and the web are key factors that customers find valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vRealize Network Insight?

Broadcom is known for increasing product prices, making them expensive compared to what people used to pay. I liken the subscription model to not truly owning what you pay for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vRealize Network Insight?

Right now, I do not see a specific area for improvement. My main concern is understanding the intentions of Broadcom, which has acquired VMware. Broadcom should improve by going back to what was wo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

Opsview vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 18% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

More OP5 Monitor Competitors

ThousandEyes vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 15% of the time

DX NetOps vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 11% of the time

DX Spectrum vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 11% of the time

More vRealize Network Insight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OP5 Monitor

June 2025

Download OP5 Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

vRealize Network Insight

June 2025

Download vRealize Network Insight product report

Also Known As

No data available

Arkin

Overview

OP5 Monitor - The Complete Monitoring Solution

OP5 Monitor is a flexible and highly scalable monitoring solution for all sizes of environments. Use just one product to monitor your IT environment regardless of location, whether on-premise, in dynamic environments, public cloud or a hybrid of these.

Digital transformation adds extra layers and complexity to the IT estate by creating a hybrid IT environment of both static and dynamic environments, that can be difficult to monitor efficiently. ITRS OP5 Monitor gives enterprises full visibility over their entire IT estate through a single pane of glass, allowing them to consolidate monitoring tools and cut down costs.

ITRS

VMware vRealize Network Insight delivers intelligent operations for software-defined networking and security. It helps customers build an optimized, highly-available and secure network infrastructure across multi-cloud environments. It accelerates micro-segmentation planning and deployment, enables visibility across virtual and physical networks and provides operational views to manage and scale VMware NSX deployments.

VMware

Sample Customers

Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan

NTTi3, VCIX-NV, VMware Networking and Security Business Unit, Illumio, CompuNet

Buyer's Guide

OP5 Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight

May 2025

Free Report: OP5 Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight

Find out what your peers are saying about OP5 Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OP5 Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.