Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix vs Safeguard for Privileged Sessions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Privileged Acc...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
34th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Safeguard for Privileged Se...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
56th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Hicham Barnoussi - PeerSpot reviewer
A reliable solution with great password and session management
The setup process depends on the environment of the customer. It's not dependent on the solution. For customers with normal use cases and scenarios, it's a straightforward implementation, but for a customer with more than one environment, they may have BeyondTrust in one environment and Safeguard in another one. When they want to consolidate later, there may be complications. It depends on the devices and assets they would like to have under their PAM solution. The standard time for implementation is four weeks. I rate the setup an eight out of ten. There needs to be a dedicated resource for maintenance.
Use Safeguard for Privileged Sessions?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
858,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

University of East Anglia, nForce Secure, dunnhumby
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2025.
858,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.