NGINX API Gateway vs Runscope comparison

F5 and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Monitoring Software category. F5 is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #3. F5 holds a 12.2% mindshare in AMS, compared to Broadcom’s 14.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

NGINX API Gateway

Read 3 NGINX API Gateway reviews

291 Views
46 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Runscope

Read 11 Runscope reviews

193 Views
62 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NGINX API Gateway

Runscope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NGINX API Gateway and Runscope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NGINX API Gateway vs. Runscope Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NGINX API Gateway vs. Runscope

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NGINX API Gateway

Ranking in API Monitoring Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Runscope

Ranking in API Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NGINX API Gateway is 12.2%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Runscope is 14.9%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

M.A. Faisal

General Manager at bKash Limited

A scalable and affordable solution that performs well and provides excellent technical support

If we publish API or GET requests, sometimes someone can do a POST request of the API. Such security violations are not visible in the product. Other solutions provide such security features. The product does not provide visibility into the security loopholes in the authentication and authorization mechanism. The product must improve its security features. It has protection capabilities, but it must provide better visibility on the dashboard. The dashboard must be improved a lot.

Read full review

QualityA876f

Quality Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Enabled us to set up automatic regression tests that cover everything we need to monitor

We would like to be able to select the actual time a test will run automatically. It appears that you can set up the automatic schedule, but the test runs based on the last time it ran and not a time you select. Since we want these tests to run in the middle of the night, it would be nice to be able to select that. Also, it would be nice to be able to generate API documentation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"API routing is the most valuable feature."

"We do not face any lags."

"It's easy to install, and the performance is good."

"Tests are per-step configurable with script capabilities and support for token-based authentication using variables. Configurable test frequency and integration with both Slack and PagerDuty for alerting our DevOps team are also important. General use of the dashboard by multiple team members is also valuable."

"When it's a problem on our side, the server is down, or there is a lack of memory, the first thing to break is the API, because the calls can't be processed. So we know exactly at that moment because we receive notifications, and we can take action. It doesn't only notify us of the type problem, but it also links it to our servers."

"We have the ability to populate environment variables using scripts. This allows us to keep the configuration mostly dynamic and avoid a lot of manual updates when something changes."

"We utilize modular tests based on environment variables. These have saved QA a lot of time when setting up our back-end automation."

"It helps us verify that production deployments do not break the features our customers use."

"This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue."

"It is a cloud-based environment for building and executing tests, which allows me to focus on building, running, and reviewing test results."

"Environment initial variables allow our team to run tests against multiple environments on the fly."

More Runscope pros

Cons

"The product must improve its security features."

"It could be more secure because security is always a problem."

"The UI could be more attractive."

"We would like to be able to select the actual time a test will run automatically. It appears that you can set up the automatic schedule, but the test runs based on the last time it ran and not a time you select. Since we want these tests to run in the middle of the night, it would be nice to be able to select that."

"The initial setup included a lot of repetitive manual work."

"If triggering test bucket via trigger API, there is no option to see if the tests which were triggered passed or failed."

"We would like to have an improved ability to share a set of tests across different environments (e.g., dev, stage, and prod)."

"If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time."

"There are not many options for scalability."

"One thing that can be improved is the logging. Sometimes, when we have an error, we don't know how to find more information about the problem that has happened. Sometimes, it just returns something like "that gateway." More information would be a way to improve it."

"It would be nice to be able to generate API documentation."

More Runscope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open source version, so there is no cost involved."

"We are using the open-source version."

"Pricing is fair."

"Having the different plans organized by team size, buckets, and requests per billing period works for our needs. Larger companies may need to take a close look at these elements."

"The price for the product is very reasonable for a team of more than four to five members."

"Runscope pricing is unbeatable"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NGINX API Gateway?

We do not face any lags.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX API Gateway?

We are using the open-source version. We are planning to buy the licensed version. The solution costs less in the Asia-Pacific region.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NGINX API Gateway?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Postman vs NGINX API Gateway

Compared 100% of the time

More NGINX API Gateway Competitors

Postman vs Runscope

Compared 100% of the time

More Runscope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download NGINX API Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Runscope

April 2025

Download Runscope product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA Runscope

Overview

The NGINX Plus API gateway authenticates API calls, routes requests to appropriate backends, applies rate limits to prevent overloading services and to mitigate volumetric attacks, offloads SSL/TLS traffic, and handles errors and exceptions. NGINX's API gateway takes all API requests from a client, determines which services are needed, and delivers the result in a high‑performance manner.

NGINX Plus API gateway is used to protect APIs with rate‑limiting policies, enforce specific request methods, and provide fine‑grained access control:

Ensures application backends are not overwhelmed by a problematic or malicious API clients through rate limits based on attribute of the request.
NGINX Plus allows only specific request methods for app services. For example, you can accept only the GET method to ensure that access to your inventory service is read‑only (just returns the inventory).
Controls access to specific resources using JSON Web Tokens (JWTs). For example, you can allow write access to a service for API clients with admin credentials, but only read access for clients with standard user credentials.

Information not available

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Twilio, Microsoft, Adobe, Okta, Tesco, Charter Communications

Buyer's Guide

NGINX API Gateway vs. Runscope

April 2025

Free Report: NGINX API Gateway vs. Runscope

Find out what your peers are saying about NGINX API Gateway vs. Runscope and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NGINX API Gateway vs. Runscope report.

See our list of best API Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all API Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.