We performed a comparison between Netskope Private Access and Pulse Secure Pulse SDP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Lookout is a well-established and powerful secure web gateway (SWG) solution that protects more than 200 million users from threats that can result from the penetration of unsecured web traffic into their networks. Lookout is designed to enable organizations to work remotely while maintaining a tight blanket of security over their confidential business data. It provides administrators with security that extends from their endpoints to the cloud service that they are using to run their organization’s network.
Users of Lookout are able to proactively detect threats and keep themselves secure from a field of threats that constantly evolves. IT teams can protect their organizations without having to rely on any other security solutions. This singular solution can run on multiple kinds of mobile devices. The privacy of individuals is preserved while keeping compliance rules intact. Additionally, users gain access to a number of tools that enable them to prevent security breaches from taking place.
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Lookout include:
Netskope Private Access is an integral component of the Netskope Security Cloud platform that provides zero-trust secure access to enterprise applications and data in hybrid IT (public cloud and data center) environments. It offers comprehensive policy management, compliance assessment, and supports any application, protocol, and device to reduce risk and simplify security operations.
Pulse SDP is a Zero Trust secure access architecture for today’s modern application infrastructure. It enables direct, secure access to individual applications and requires users and their devices to be verified before access is allowed. The result is an enhanced security profile, better device compliance, and an improved user experience while defending against modern security threats and lateral malware spread.
Netskope Private Access is ranked 8th in ZTNA as a Service with 1 review while Pulse Secure Pulse SDP is ranked 7th in ZTNA. Netskope Private Access is rated 10.0, while Pulse Secure Pulse SDP is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Netskope Private Access writes "A perfect solution that provides security and protection, improves the latency, and is very easy to set up". On the other hand, Netskope Private Access is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Appgate SDP, Google BeyondCorp Remote Access and Cloudflare Access, whereas Pulse Secure Pulse SDP is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Cyolo, Appgate SDP, Duo Security and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.