We compared Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Netgate TNSR across several parameters based on our user's reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: Users' feedback on the duration required to establish Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks suggests that deployment and setup may be separate phases, but different users experienced different timeframes. For Netgate TNSR, some users also experienced variations in deployment and setup durations, emphasizing the need to consider the context in which these terms are used.
Features: Prisma Access is highly valued for its security measures, threat prevention capabilities, and ability to securely connect remote offices and mobile users. Netgate TNSR is praised for its high performance capabilities, scalability, and advanced security features.
Room For Improvement: Palo Alto Networks should focus on improving speed, performance, and compatibility with applications and platforms. Customers also suggest enhancing customer support and responsiveness. Netgate TNSR needs improvements in user interface design, configuration processes, documentation and support resources, performance, and stability.
Pricing and ROI: Users find the setup cost of Prisma Access to be reasonable, while Netgate TNSR is straightforward. Prisma Access has a user-friendly licensing process, while Netgate TNSR offers flexibility and options to choose from. Prisma Access has shown significant ROI, proving its effectiveness and value. Netgate TNSR has also provided positive returns on investment and profitability for users.
Customer Service: Unlike Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, user feedback for Netgate TNSR highlights the company's excellent assistance and prompt response to queries or issues. They have commended Netgate TNSR's reliable and supportive customer service.
Comparison Results: Prisma Access is praised for its robust security measures, advanced threat prevention capabilities, and its ability to securely connect remote offices and mobile users. Users also appreciate its scalability, flexibility, and excellent customer service. On the other hand, Netgate TNSR receives positive feedback for its high performance capabilities, robust security measures, and exceptional scalability. However, it lacks in user interface design and easier configuration and setup processes according to user feedback.
"The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to change the gateway. For example, if there's a problem with a specific region or vendor, we can make modifications. The solution is scalable, and there are different gateways that can be created depending on the demand."
"Overall, the cost savings, ease of deployment, and better VPN user experience and performance are valuable."
"There are plenty of features this solution provides and the most valuable would be the complete security protection we are receiving. We are provided with similar security that the Palo Alto AWS solution has. This includes features such as a firewall and machine learning AI."
"The features I find most valuable is WildFire, user integration, and the basic technology features."
"Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is a seamless solution."
"This solution provides a DLP on the cloud and very few people have a scanning device for data at rest."
"It is easy to use, easy to integrate, and is stable. It's scalable as well."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it offers stability and scalability while being a very secure product."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It wasn't so satisfying to work with it. There is room for improvement in the policy management. It is difficult to cover the entire scenery through Palo Alto products."
"Prisma's integration between operational technology and IT should be more seamless. Right now, it requires additional setup and maintenance."
"The cloud setup is straightforward, and the onboarding process is much better, but the on-premises initial setup is slightly complex."
"The price can be reduced to make it more competitive."
"Lacks a hybrid model which has API plus in-line security."
"It applies commits to the firewalls slowly. There isn't an API you can use for anything. We've previously had trouble with the egress IP addresses though we expressed to engineering that those mustn't change. They changed several times without warning, causing a lot of headaches."
"The documentation is generally good, but they could provide a more detailed description of all the configuration steps. I have to search for information or call support. Palo Alto could add more knowledge base articles about configuration with screenshots and walkthroughs. That would be helpful. When configuring a product, you want to see examples of how it is done."
"There is room for improvement in the multi-environment visibility, especially around containers."
More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Netgate TNSR is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 5th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 57 reviews. Netgate TNSR is rated 7.6, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Netgate TNSR writes "Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks writes "Integration with Palo Alto platforms such as Cortex Data Lake and Autofocus gives us visibility into our attack surface". Netgate TNSR is most compared with MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Juniper MX Series Routers and MikroTik Routers and Switches, whereas Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Netskope , Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access and Prisma SD-WAN.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
