Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Netezza Analytics vs SAP HANA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Netezza Analytics
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (9th)
SAP HANA
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Data Virtualization (2nd), Embedded Database (4th), Relational Databases Tools (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Shiv Subramaniam Koduvayur - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust solution with good support, but a better GUI for database management is needed
The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this solution is that a lot of evaluation should be done before starting. Also, we needed to put a lot of effort into understanding the different functions that the product offers. This allows you to best leverage the capability of the product. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Dhiraj Jankar - PeerSpot reviewer
Users appreciate the mix of in-memory architecture and ease of backend management
The most valuable SAP HANA features are that, compared to Oracle, there is less administrative work and less complex work to handle, making it very straightforward. The tool itself takes care of the backend work. The main benefits SAP HANA provides to users include its architecture, which combines both column store and row store capabilities. Some places find the row feature important, whereas others find column store important. It allows some tables to be stored in a column base, others in a row base, and the In-Memory functionalities are mostly the highlight of SAP HANA, especially compared to disk-based memory users. This was the main reason SAP HANA was introduced initially.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"What I like best about SAP HANA is that it's faster than Microsoft SQL Server."
"The solution is marvelous because it controls everything including workflow and that makes our company more productive."
"SAP HANA's most valuable features are monitoring, reporting, and price and stock control."
"The most valuable features of SAP HANA include its user-friendliness, flexibility, and extensive support for various functionalities like finance, logistics, and workforce processes."
"One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory."
"The speed at which it gets the data is great."
"The UX experience is very good."
"SAP HANA's interface is pretty user-friendly."
 

Cons

"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"It could be a bit more scalable."
"The initial setup of SAP HANA is complex. We did the implementation of one site, and a global deployment will take another three to four years."
"The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement."
"Needs graphical programming without coding."
"When we are using SAP HANA we have some difficulty with the customization. We would like to be able to add and make customized menus."
"The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help."
"The only downside of the product is that it is an expensive solution that needs to consider lowering its prices to improve the product."
"There could be better management for faster updates, last year there were some changes in India to the e-invoicing feature."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
"For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
"The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
"People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?"
"Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO."
"The tool’s subscription is yearly."
"We pay for a maintenance license, and the licensing cost is high. In general, it is a very expensive solution."
"There is an annual license to use SAP HANA."
"We are spending about 20,000 to 30,000 euros on the solution."
"It is expensive, which isn't a problem for us because SAP HANA is processing the data so fast."
"We pay $200 on a monthly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What are the biggest benefits of using SAP HANA?
Based on my work with SAP HANA, the biggest benefit that it can bring to your business is total data management. This product is by SAP - a company that serves almost all needs a client may have co...
Is SAP HANA’s customer and technical support reliable?
We have been using SAP HANA for a fairly short period of time and have only taken advantage of their customer support. So far, we have not had issues that required specialized help from technical s...
Is SAP HANA difficult to set up and start using?
SAP HANA is fairly easy to set up, however, I do not think a complete beginner can do it. You certainly need some preparation - either you need to have experience with similar solutions, or with ot...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

A leading online advertising network
Unilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Find out what your peers are saying about Netezza Analytics vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.