We performed a comparison between Netezza Analytics and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features I have found are speed, dashboard, and reporting."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It usually takes around eight months but it depends on a customer's requirements. We can spend a month or two customizing."
"One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory."
"The memory is the solution's most valuable feature. It's the main feature of HANA. Others are still the regular IT databases that are on storage and are therefore much slower than HANA. The solution is quite fast."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the interaction it provides with external suppliers and clients."
"Eases management of databases."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"SAP HANA's long run time to extract data could be improved upon."
"The product is very demanding on memory requirements."
"In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies."
"HANA could be improved by adding analytics and development models in the institution."
"You cannot apply mulit-join inside the calculation views, for example, when you are joining tables."
"They should develop and improve the solution's data management system."
"I don't have direct access to SAP, and instead, I need to go through the SAP office in India."
"Needs graphical programming without coding."
Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop while SAP HANA is ranked 1st in Embedded Database with 81 reviews. Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.