Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nastel XRay [EOL] vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nastel XRay [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (13th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Nastel XRay [EOL]?
Share your opinion
AR
It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia
We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.  JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.  JBoss could add more automation. We have been using JBoss for five…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
859,545 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Salesforce and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: June 2025.
859,545 professionals have used our research since 2012.