Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs n8n Automation Stack with maintenance support by Intuz Inc. comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

n8n Automation Stack with m...
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
2.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (17th)
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto N...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (9th), Container Security (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (2nd), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

RB
Digital Media Designer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Has reduced manual work and improved workflow efficiency through low-code automation
It has saved us a lot of manual effort and time. Earlier, we had to rely on custom scripts and cron jobs, but now everything runs smoothly using n8n flows. The Intuz support team was also quick to help whenever we needed setup assistance or faced configuration issues. Overall, it has made our internal operations more efficient.
reviewer2776578 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Image scanning has supported consistent security practices during cloud deployment
On a scale of ten, we would say people are happy with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for the part we use. People are okay with it. We probably would give an eight. We don't give ten because if we don't use the other parts of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, it's because it was difficult to implement from an operational point of view. We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts. People have other tools and in the end, we don't use the full capabilities of a product that we pay for. It's partially related to the difficulty to integrate Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks runtime in our company's support process. We don't use the real-time monitoring part of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. We don't know about the automated remediation feature of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has saved us a lot of manual effort and time; earlier, we had to rely on custom scripts and cron jobs, but now everything runs smoothly using n8n flows."
"The most valuable feature is the continuous cloud compliance monitoring and alerting."
"CSPM is the most valuable feature."
"The opportunity in our company is good because we are already using Red Hat at different stages of cloud computing."
"Through Prisma Cloud, we can write Lambda functions, configure policies to check the security posture, and get reports. We can do a lot more."
"Engineering is thinking it's easy to integrate because we use many Red Hat products."
"CSPM is very useful because it gives us good policies and violation alerts."
"The most valuable feature of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the CSPM, which we use the most. Additionally, the investigation and alerts are useful, and the creation of queries."
"It is user-friendly. It has a good look and feel and reporting structure. It provides a single pane of glass. These are the things that I like."
 

Cons

"It would be helpful to see a few more native integrations with project management tools such as Asana or Monday.com in future releases."
"Though Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides excellent security, is a pioneer in this space, and knows what it's doing, from a user perspective, it would have been better if it was a little easier to use."
"There should be some kind of automation, AI incorporation, and bot system. All these would add value."
"I believe there are some issues with the product's maturity. In some cases, it could malfunction concerning Cloud Native."
"Prisma could improve the data quality. One challenge is that when an application is deployed on multiple virtual machines, we get an alert for each machine, but the biggest challenge is container flapping. When containers go up and down, we get 100 alerts on one day, but it reports 20 the next day. The numbers keep changing, and the app owners tell us, "You reported a hundred vulnerabilities from my app, and today, you report 20. I haven't made any changes in production, so is your data correct or not?""
"While the documentation continually improves, it still has limitations compared to the extensive resources available for older products like hardware firewalls, which have been around for approximately 20 years."
"When an account is onboarded, if it is missing any permission, it should automatically be updated with the required permissions and policies."
"I would like to see the inclusion of automated counter-attack, although this is probably illegal."
"In terms of securing cloud-native development at build time, a lot of improvement is needed. Currently, it's more a runtime solution than a build-time solution. For runtime, I would rate it at seven out of 10, but for build-time there is a lot of work to be done."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Its price is reasonable as compared to other products. The main challenge is explaining the licensing model to customers. It isn't a problem related to Palo Alto. Commonly, people don't understand cloud licensing or security licensing. When they have fixed virtual machines, they know what they are going to be charged, but when it comes to cloud automation, it is hard for them to get clarity in case of high workloads or when they have enabled auto-scaling, etc. It would be helpful if Palo Alto can educate people on their licensing programs."
"The pricing is competitive; for the most part, the security firms have similar prices."
"Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has helped the company save some money. Cost-wise, it's okay."
"I don't know a better way to do it, but their licensing is a little confusing. That's due to the breadth of different types of technologies they are trying to cover. The way you license depends on where you're securing. When they were Twistlock it was a simple licensing scheme and you could tell what you were doing. Now that they've changed that scheme with Palo Alto, it is quite confusing. It's very difficult to predict what your costs are going to be as you try to expand coverage."
"Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year."
"Prisma Cloud's licensing system functions as expected with a solid licensing infrastructure."
"The Prisma Cloud pricing is good."
"The product is very expensive, but the cost is a necessary evil; I don't know how we could have any kind of cloud presence without this type of monitoring. The pricing is calculated by module and resource usage. Ultimately, it saves us money in the amount of time we would spend uncovering what it uncovers, and we might not make the required discoveries without it anyway. Prisma offers incredible value, though I wish it were cheaper."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise56
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for n8n Automation Stack with maintenance support by Intuz Inc.?
The pricing is very fair. It is free to start with, which makes it perfect for small teams or startups who want to explore automation without heavy upfront costs. Even with Intuz’s maintenance supp...
What needs improvement with n8n Automation Stack with maintenance support by Intuz Inc.?
The product is already great for most use cases. It would be helpful to see a few more native integrations with project management tools such as Asana or Monday.com in future releases.
What is your primary use case for n8n Automation Stack with maintenance support by Intuz Inc.?
We mainly use it for automating repetitive workflows between different tools such as Slack, Google Sheets, and internal APIs. It helps us set up end-to-end process automation without much coding ef...
What is your primary use case for Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks?
Prisma Cloud helps support DevSecOps methodologies, making those responsibilities easier to manage.
What Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform do you recommend?
We like Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, since it offers us incredible visibility into our entire cloud system. We are able to easily see where our container vulnerabilities lie and and where cl...
What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.