MuleSoft Composer vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

Salesforce and TIBCO are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Salesforce is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8, while TIBCO is ranked #19. Salesforce holds a 2.5% mindshare in PaaS, compared to TIBCO’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
731 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews

769 Views
400 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

TIBCO Cloud Integration and MuleSoft Composer are prominent tools in the integration space. While TIBCO Cloud Integration is valued for its competitive pricing and support, MuleSoft Composer is preferred for its advanced feature set that users believe justify its higher cost.

Features: TIBCO Cloud Integration users appreciate its robust connectivity options, real-time data processing capabilities, and easy-to-use workflow automation. MuleSoft Composer users value its pre-built connectors, extensive library of templates, and advanced integration capabilities. Users see MuleSoft Composer as superior for its comprehensive tools and templates, facilitating smoother and more efficient integration tasks.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO Cloud Integration users suggest improving the learning curve and enhancing the documentation, as well as better onboarding experiences for new users. MuleSoft Composer users express the need for better error logging, more granular control over permissions, and enhanced user training materials. Both platforms have specific areas where enhancements can make a significant difference in their usability and control functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO Cloud Integration users find it easy to deploy with supportive customer service, noting a relatively smooth setup process. MuleSoft Composer users have mixed experiences with deployment but find its customer service comprehensive and helpful in mitigating initial challenges. TIBCO Cloud Integration takes the lead in deployment ease, whereas MuleSoft Composer stands out in customer support.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Cloud Integration is praised for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it a preferred choice for budget-conscious buyers. MuleSoft Composer, although more expensive, is deemed worth the investment due to its extensive features and higher perceived value, leading to significant long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th), Cloud Data Integration (15th)

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 2.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 2.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	2.5%
TIBCO Cloud Integration	2.1%
Other	95.4%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users

The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."

"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

Cons

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."

"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."

"The deployment was rather complicated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"We don't pay for a license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Consumer Goods Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Boomi iPaaS vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 19% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 11% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 8% of the time

More TIBCO Cloud Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2026

Download TIBCO Cloud Integration product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

No data available

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

January 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.