We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"Cloud Platform's stability is great."
"The most valuable feature is the data synchronization, or the push and pull of the data."
"The most valuable feature is integration."
"SAP is an excellent company with an excellent reputation, excellent products, and dedicated customer support."
"It’s easy to maintain, as everything is handled by SAP."
"It is a stable solution, as I never encountered issues when using it."
"The most valuable features of the SAP Cloud Platform are the extensions and integrations. Additionally, there are a lot of AI-based microservices."
"One of the best features of this solution is that it is web-based and you can log in and work on it from anywhere."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"I would like to see more and better support for data transformations."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution requires more flexibility overall."
"The tool's UI is not very intuitive for cloud integration, so it needs research to understand its options and how it may work."
"Better connectivity to on-premise systems would help us to support older systems that are migrating to the cloud."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"When I started looking at the client's IT architecture, I started by doing a study of their services, DVM, data volume, and management services. According to the results, they could be a lot better at this."
MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Zapier, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and webMethods.io Integration. See our MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
