MuleSoft Composer vs Qlik Compose comparison

Salesforce and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #38 with an average rating of 7.0. Salesforce holds a 0.4% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,201 Views
384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,345 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and MuleSoft Composer are competing products in data management and automation. MuleSoft Composer is perceived as superior due to its robust feature set, while Qlik Compose offers strong value through pricing and support.

Features: Qlik Compose provides effective data integration and automation, data warehouse automation, and user-friendly interfaces for data transformation tasks. MuleSoft Composer offers extensive connectivity options, detailed workflow automation, and effective API management for diverse platform integration.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could benefit from enhanced real-time data processing, better cloud integration, and more comprehensive training resources. MuleSoft Composer might improve with more intuitive interfaces, reduced setup complexity, and optimized cost management for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer is cloud-based, ensuring simple integration with robust customer service. Qlik Compose allows both on-premises and cloud setups, offering deployment flexibility but experiencing varied customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose is competitively priced, offering straightforward licensing and solid ROI, appealing especially to mid-sized enterprises. MuleSoft Composer has higher initial costs but provides a strong ROI through extensive features, making it a valuable choice for businesses needing broad integration capabilities despite the price.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Qlik Compose

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (11th)

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

38th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.4%
Qlik Compose	1.0%
Other	98.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"It can scale."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"There could be more customization options."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 34% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 19% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 34% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 14% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Denodo vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

September 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

September 2025

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Qlik Compose

September 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.