We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"I like that the product transforms data and provides real-time applications."
"For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions like Oracle Data Guard, especially for Oracle-to-non-Oracle replication scenarios."
"Oracle GoldenGate features work fine, which is what I like about it. I also like that it's scalable, easy to set up, and has good technical support."
"Since the world is going towards open source, the solution's heterogeneous data migration feature is very useful."
"What I like most about Oracle GoldenGate is that it supports cross-platform migrations. For example, Oracle GoldenGate could pump data from one type of system to another such as the data from Oracle DB to SQL Db2."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"It would be great if Oracle added some enhanced features or more functionalities to Oracle GoldenGate."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"Oracle GoldenGate's installation is not user-friendly, we had to read a lot of documentation for the setup and configuration."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
"The GoldenGate license is very costly."
"The problem with GoldenGate is it is very complex to use. You need heavyweight skills to use it."
"The tool's connections are disconnected at times. The tool needs to integrate other databases."
MuleSoft Composer is ranked 40th in Data Integration with 3 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. MuleSoft Composer is rated 7.6, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Zapier and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.